You’re absolutely right, anonymous, it was no coincidence that Wilson was sent by the CIA to investigate yellow cake. He was sent because his wife recommended him. And by the way, the British still stand behind their intelligence with respect to urnaium and Niger. What the hell do you think Iraq was trying to buy from the world’s largest uranium supplier, pork bellies?

If we do really have to get into providing factual evidence and the like, I will be more than happy to get into that, but you need provide your’s first, because I can call upon hundreds of folks who will provide me with plenty of facts. I doubt you can do the same. Answer Nitro’s request and the game is on, dig?

“In the January 28 speech, Bush claimed that “the British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.” That assertion was similar to claims made previously by administration officials, including Secretary of State Colin Powell (CBS Evening News, 12/19/02), that Iraq had sought to import yellowcake uranium from Niger, a strong indication that Saddam Hussein’s regime was reconstituting its nuclear weapons program.

In fact, the Niger story, as documented by journalist Seymour Hersh (New Yorker, 3/31/03) and others, was based on crudely forged documents. In addition, the administration’s own investigation in March 2002 concluded that the story was bogus. As one former State Department official put it, “This wasn’t highly contested. There weren’t strong advocates on the other side. It was done, shot down” (Time, 7/21/03).”

Where’s the innuendo in my post?

You have posted a few obviously incorrect facts along the way. You have had a tendency to make up things about me in order to distract from an argument and as I recall made a few far off statements about things NASA has invented. If people make mistakes it is easy to cite the correct information and move on. Why waste time on personal attacks.

Prove both allegations. I want pictures, dates, times, real evidence that would stand up in a court room. Otherwise, you’re just blowing innuendo.

Nitro = permanent ignore.

Here’s a comment with no innuendo.

You are a loser.

1. an indirect intimation about a person or thing, esp. of a disparaging or a derogatory nature.
2. Law.
a. a parenthetic explanation or specification in a pleading.
b. (in an action for slander or libel) the explanation and elucidation of the words alleged to be defamatory.

What about my post was innuendo? I think I was making a pretty direct statement on both counts.

I think your post can be summed up with one word: innuendo. Nice try though!