<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still Waiting&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnpublius.com/2007/08/still-waiting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnpublius.com/2007/08/still-waiting/</link>
	<description>Tracking Minnesota Politics Since 2005</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Noah Kunin</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2007/08/still-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-6592</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah Kunin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 02:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2007/08/still-waiting/#comment-6592</guid>
		<description>Zach - good call.  The C-12 is the obvious choice.  I'm trying to calculate what the flight would cost..

Also looking at travel disclosures.  It's slim pickings - turns out many of the records must be requested IN PERSON in D.C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach - good call.  The C-12 is the obvious choice.  I&#8217;m trying to calculate what the flight would cost..</p>
<p>Also looking at travel disclosures.  It&#8217;s slim pickings - turns out many of the records must be requested IN PERSON in&nbsp;D.C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swiftee</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2007/08/still-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-6600</link>
		<dc:creator>Swiftee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2007/08/still-waiting/#comment-6600</guid>
		<description>Randy says: "I don't get it. It's wrong if only one party does it, but it's okay if both parties do it? Or is your moral rage diminished as long as you can point fingers at some Democrats?"

I think I was about as plain as possible. If Norm flew his family to a foreign country on our dime, he was wrong. Period. End of story.

Capiche?

My added commentary pointed out that if one cared to dig any deeper (not that I expect a Democrat to uncover anything that might provide a discordant resonance in the 'bat cave), they would find that abuse of power knows no party affiliation.

Which is why the true conservative wants to shrink governmental interference to within the bounds set by the constitution, without regard to party lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy says: &#8220;I don&#8217;t get it. It&#8217;s wrong if only one party does it, but it&#8217;s okay if both parties do it? Or is your moral rage diminished as long as you can point fingers at some Democrats?&#8221;</p>
<p>I think I was about as plain as possible. If Norm flew his family to a foreign country on our dime, he was wrong. Period. End of story.</p>
<p>Capiche?</p>
<p>My added commentary pointed out that if one cared to dig any deeper (not that I expect a Democrat to uncover anything that might provide a discordant resonance in the &#8216;bat cave), they would find that abuse of power knows no party affiliation.</p>
<p>Which is why the true conservative wants to shrink governmental interference to within the bounds set by the constitution, without regard to party&nbsp;lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2007/08/still-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-6599</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2007/08/still-waiting/#comment-6599</guid>
		<description>Excellent point Noah.  I think they must have been referring to the C-12 (who knows where the extra zero got put in) a plane used for (and this is according to wikipedia, so not the best source) embassy support.  I will try to dig into this more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point Noah.  I think they must have been referring to the C-12 (who knows where the extra zero got put in) a plane used for (and this is according to wikipedia, so not the best source) embassy support.  I will try to dig into this&nbsp;more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah Kunin</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2007/08/still-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-6591</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah Kunin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 04:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2007/08/still-waiting/#comment-6591</guid>
		<description>I'm not a military aviation expert but while I was trying to research what the fuel and operating costs of the C120 were...I couldn't.

As in, I can't find a current tranport vehicle in use with that designation.  The only think that comes close is the Fairchild XC-120 Packplane and only one was ever built.  The anonymous source which is the source of the story should be contacted again to clear up the story.

If anyone has any info on what plane be could have meant (or if there is a current C120) would be helpful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a military aviation expert but while I was trying to research what the fuel and operating costs of the C120 were&#8230;I couldn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>As in, I can&#8217;t find a current tranport vehicle in use with that designation.  The only think that comes close is the Fairchild XC-120 Packplane and only one was ever built.  The anonymous source which is the source of the story should be contacted again to clear up the story.</p>
<p>If anyone has any info on what plane be could have meant (or if there is a current C120) would be&nbsp;helpful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WE LOVE JAMES BROOM WELLSTONE</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2007/08/still-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-6590</link>
		<dc:creator>WE LOVE JAMES BROOM WELLSTONE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 01:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2007/08/still-waiting/#comment-6590</guid>
		<description>James Broom Wellstone WAS GETTING VIDEO TAPPED AND INTERVIEWED TODAY IN THE DFL BOOTH BY THE DFL??????

PLEASE SOMEBODY GET THAT AND YOU TUBE IT. I WOULD LOVE TO SEE IF HE IS MENTALLY DISTURBED LIKE THAT LOSER WHO WILL BE FIRED ANY DAY SAID..

GOOD JOB ON NO SEAN BROOM POSTS.

YOU TUBE WHATEVER THE DFL RECORDED TODAY FROM JAMES BROOM WELLSTONE.....I WOULD LOVE TO SEE IT.

...AND BROOM .....Please start You Tubing or doing video's!!! We all want to hear and see what you have to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Broom Wellstone WAS GETTING VIDEO TAPPED AND INTERVIEWED TODAY IN THE DFL BOOTH BY THE DFL??????</p>
<p>PLEASE SOMEBODY GET THAT AND YOU TUBE IT. I WOULD LOVE TO SEE IF HE IS MENTALLY DISTURBED LIKE THAT LOSER WHO WILL BE FIRED ANY DAY SAID..</p>
<p>GOOD JOB ON NO SEAN BROOM POSTS.</p>
<p>YOU TUBE WHATEVER THE DFL RECORDED TODAY FROM JAMES BROOM WELLSTONE&#8230;..I WOULD LOVE TO SEE IT.</p>
<p>&#8230;AND BROOM &#8230;..Please start You Tubing or doing video&#8217;s!!! We all want to hear and see what you have to&nbsp;say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2007/08/still-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-6598</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 15:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2007/08/still-waiting/#comment-6598</guid>
		<description>Swiftee--I don't get it.  It's wrong if only one party does it, but it's okay if both parties do it?  Or is your moral rage diminished as long as you can point fingers at some Democrats?

Ethics should not be a partisan issue, but condemnation seems to be.  I can visualize the "Democrats are silent when it's one of their own post coming.  I won't argue either way on that, but I will just say that they shouldn't be, and, if they are, that does not excuse Republicans for their silence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swiftee&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;I don&#8217;t get it.  It&#8217;s wrong if only one party does it, but it&#8217;s okay if both parties do it?  Or is your moral rage diminished as long as you can point fingers at some Democrats?</p>
<p>Ethics should not be a partisan issue, but condemnation seems to be.  I can visualize the &#8220;Democrats are silent when it&#8217;s one of their own post coming.  I won&#8217;t argue either way on that, but I will just say that they shouldn&#8217;t be, and, if they are, that does not excuse Republicans for their&nbsp;silence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MinneaPolitics</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2007/08/still-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-6597</link>
		<dc:creator>MinneaPolitics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2007/08/still-waiting/#comment-6597</guid>
		<description>It's not as if blog comments can be traded in for money or tickets to see a movie. Perhaps a more effective form of protest would be not reading the blog and deny it page views, thereby decreasing Publius' blogads revenue. But I'm guessing you'd rather have something to whine about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not as if blog comments can be traded in for money or tickets to see a movie. Perhaps a more effective form of protest would be not reading the blog and deny it page views, thereby decreasing Publius&#8217; blogads revenue. But I&#8217;m guessing you&#8217;d rather have something to whine&nbsp;about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2007/08/still-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-6595</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2007/08/still-waiting/#comment-6595</guid>
		<description>Oh heaven forbid-- you aren't going to respond to one of my posts ever!  I will surely miss out.

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh heaven forbid&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;you aren&#8217;t going to respond to one of my posts ever!  I will surely miss out.&nbsp;Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave W.</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2007/08/still-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-6594</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2007/08/still-waiting/#comment-6594</guid>
		<description>It wouldn't surprise me if Norm used his own money on that trip. He's been paid $650,000 from the drug companies since 2002 so he should still have money.

....but then again why would he use his money when he can steal from us.  Please look further into this matter Zack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if Norm used his own money on that trip. He&#8217;s been paid $650,000 from the drug companies since 2002 so he should still have money.</p>
<p>&#8230;.but then again why would he use his money when he can steal from us.  Please look further into this matter&nbsp;Zack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave W.</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2007/08/still-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-6596</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2007/08/still-waiting/#comment-6596</guid>
		<description>...speaking of "The Hill" magazine.  James McBroom/James Broom Wellstone also made it on the cover page of The Hill magazine on Aug 6th.

I listened to 1280am at 630pm last night and was very concerned that Sean Broom called Broom/Wellstone a "Stalker"

Even more so Sean Broom said that James McBroom changed his name to James McBroom Wellstone when it is James Broom Wellstone.

Sean is not competent enough to comment when he doesn't know what he's talking about.

I FOR ONE WILL NEVER RESPOND TO A SEAN BROOM POST EVER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;speaking of &#8220;The Hill&#8221; magazine.  James McBroom/James Broom Wellstone also made it on the cover page of The Hill magazine on Aug 6th.</p>
<p>I listened to 1280am at 630pm last night and was very concerned that Sean Broom called Broom/Wellstone a &#8220;Stalker&#8221;</p>
<p>Even more so Sean Broom said that James McBroom changed his name to James McBroom Wellstone when it is James Broom Wellstone.</p>
<p>Sean is not competent enough to comment when he doesn&#8217;t know what he&#8217;s talking about.</p>
<p>I FOR ONE WILL NEVER RESPOND TO A SEAN BROOM POST&nbsp;EVER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.374 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-01-09 17:39:10 -->
