Comments on: Anybody But Coleman

By: GOP Finds MN Poll Totally Inaccurate, no, make that Accurate at MNpublius.com

GOP Finds MN Poll Totally Inaccurate, no, make that Accurate at MNpublius.com — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:51:26 +0000

[…] showed Norm Coleman to have approval ratings above 50% (and who can blame them after the scores of polls that show him under 50). But there’s something pretty amusing about the GOP all of a sudden […]

By: DFL Lover

DFL Lover — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:16:05 +0000

We love Broom Wellstone:

It would appear that you know who this Broom guy is?

Well so do I. I investigated this guy VERY well.

Minnesota is in for a gigantic surprise.

Broom did cost Blue Cross 80 million dollars last year,
That’s my take on it.

Michael Moore does know Broom.

whats funny about this broom guy is I don’t even thinks he wants the job of U.S. Senator.

After his non-profit company got screwed on a 80 million dollar contract, broom done snapped.

The Wellstone plane crash evidence of foul play that he claims he has was the only thing I couldn’t verify.

With everything else that he has said that I verified to be true leads me to believe that Minnesota is going to be a Hollywood movie after 2008

By: WE LOVE JAMES BROOM WELLSTONE

WE LOVE JAMES BROOM WELLSTONE — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 03:30:37 +0000

Charley:

You make a WONDERFUL point in regards to Minnesota’s next U.S. Senator.

By: Charley

Charley — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 03:06:00 +0000

I am a bit nervous about an “anybody but Coleman” approach. I remember not long ago when Democrats were so smug about defeating Bush that they ran an “anybody but Bush” campaign. Sadly, some idiot decided that they should run John Kerry as a war-monger. They had him repeat such Bushisms as “hunt them down and kill them,” instead of running him as an opposition candidate who had given that amazing Winter soldier speech and who had done such wonderful work exposing the Iran-contra fiasco. We all know how that tactic worked.

What I think we should do is actually pick the person who we think would make the best Senator, the person with the best shot of working in Congress to put the country on the right path again.

By: Joe M

Joe M — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:10:51 +0000

WELLSTONE 2008 sounds like a winner to me!!!

By: Joe M

Joe M — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:09:08 +0000

Hey Dave:

Did you see the front page story on James McBroom/Wellstone on the cover of last Tuesday’s St. Paul Legal-Ledger?

By: Dave W.

Dave W. — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:41:49 +0000

HURRICANE BROOM 2008 WILL BE AROUND TO SHUT DOWN NORM.

METEROLOGISTS STAND BY.

WELLSTONE WILL BEAT NORM AFTER ALL!

By: Jim Miller

Jim Miller — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:17:38 +0000

To call Franken a “train wreck” is a little over-the-edge, though I agree that Ciresi is clearly the better of the two candidates. Franken as worked hard as a candidate, and while he can always be expected to throw out a printable quip, he has neither the depth of experience nor the impressive intellect of Ciresi. Further, as a speaker on the stump he bumbles around the issues while Ciresi seems to have the ability to cut right to core of and reinforce his positions with reams of facts…not cute antedotes. Ciresi’s reputation as always being the best prepared lawyer in the room - no matter what room he’s in - will serve him (and Minnesota) well if we have the sense to elect him.

By: Chris

Chris — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:11:19 +0000

I think you’re wrong to say a change rather than more of the same election. The best data I’ve seen says this is an “on our side” election w\ Coleman making a dismal showing.

By: Dan

Dan — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:57:31 +0000

Two superior nominees? If we had two superior nominees, they both would be pounding Coleman in the polls, not losing to him. What we’ve got is a potentially decent nominee in Ciresi, and a complete train wreck in Franken.