<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exclusive: Randy Demmer Sued</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnpublius.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/</link>
	<description>Tracking Minnesota Politics Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:10:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-48148</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-48148</guid>
		<description>Parts Pups were never porn.  The photos in them were  like those in Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition.  The jokes were a bit off color but any real woman would just blow it off.  Any woman that would be intimidated by Parts Pups should not be in the automotive industry. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parts Pups were never porn.  The photos in them were  like those in Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition.  The jokes were a bit off color but any real woman would just blow it off.  Any woman that would be intimidated by Parts Pups should not be in the automotive&nbsp;industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13770</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13770</guid>
		<description>MO,

In all honesty, the Republican challenger (to be clear, likely the Davis campaign) has the greater responsibility.  However, MNPublius was a little sloppy (sorry guys) in their original headline which made the lawsuit seem to be current instead of something that happened ten years ago.  Also, this site seemed to trump it up big in the morning and then have to deflate the scoop by evening based on the information that came out.  I&#039;m not saying that bloggers should be held to journalistic standards, but the original headline and story was misleading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MO,</p>
<p>In all honesty, the Republican challenger (to be clear, likely the Davis campaign) has the greater responsibility.  However, MNPublius was a little sloppy (sorry guys) in their original headline which made the lawsuit seem to be current instead of something that happened ten years ago.  Also, this site seemed to trump it up big in the morning and then have to deflate the scoop by evening based on the information that came out.  I&#8217;m not saying that bloggers should be held to journalistic standards, but the original headline and story was&nbsp;misleading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MO</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13769</link>
		<dc:creator>MO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13769</guid>
		<description>So, what we are saying here is that while it was probably an (R) challenger that threatneded to leak it, it was acutally a Liberal Democrat Blogger that gave it the light of day.

So, who has the greater responsibility here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what we are saying here is that while it was probably an (R) challenger that threatneded to leak it, it was acutally a Liberal Democrat Blogger that gave it the light of&nbsp;day.</p>
<p>So, who has the greater responsibility&nbsp;here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtually Speakinig</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13757</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtually Speakinig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13757</guid>
		<description>Such a sad story!  And I&#039;m out of Kleenex . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such a sad story!  And I&#8217;m out of Kleenex . .&nbsp;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Teach</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13768</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Teach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13768</guid>
		<description>lojasmo,

WTF Genius.  I&#039;ll give you one guess who the anonymous source is and I&#039;ll bet you it goes directly to the Davis campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lojasmo,</p>
<p>WTF Genius.  I&#8217;ll give you one guess who the anonymous source is and I&#8217;ll bet you it goes directly to the Davis&nbsp;campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UPDATE ON DEMMER: INTRA-PARTY BATTLE FEEDS WARRANTLESS ATTACK at MNpublius.com</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13766</link>
		<dc:creator>UPDATE ON DEMMER: INTRA-PARTY BATTLE FEEDS WARRANTLESS ATTACK at MNpublius.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13766</guid>
		<description>[...] reported this morning about a lawsuit that had been filed against Randy Demmer a little more than 10 years [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] reported this morning about a lawsuit that had been filed against Randy Demmer a little more than 10 years&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael B. Brodkorb</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13761</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael B. Brodkorb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13761</guid>
		<description>This is a really sad story. According to the Rochester Post-Bulletin, Representative Randy Demmer received a threating phone call instructing him to end his campaign for Congress, or damaging information would be released against him.

Since Demmer didn&#039;t end his campaign for Congresss, the &quot;damaging&quot; information that was threatened to be used against him found a welcomed home on the liberal blog MN Publius, as they published it earlier this morning in an &quot;exclusive&quot; post that was first teased last evening.

Even after being hand-feed the story, MN Publius still got it wrong.  In an earlier version of their &quot;exclusive&quot; post, MN Publius claimed that Demmer was currently being sued when in fact, this matter had been resolved over ten years ago.

I&#039;m not taking a side in the GOP battle to replace Congressman Walz. But I will take a stand against liberal bloggers who publish material used to threaten and intimidate people to end their campaigns. The bloggers behind MN Publius should be embarrassed for unknowingly being associated with the threats against a legislator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really sad story. According to the Rochester Post-Bulletin, Representative Randy Demmer received a threating phone call instructing him to end his campaign for Congress, or damaging information would be released against&nbsp;him.</p>
<p>Since Demmer didn&#8217;t end his campaign for Congresss, the &#8220;damaging&#8221; information that was threatened to be used against him found a welcomed home on the liberal blog MN Publius, as they published it earlier this morning in an &#8220;exclusive&#8221; post that was first teased last&nbsp;evening.</p>
<p>Even after being hand-feed the story, MN Publius still got it wrong.  In an earlier version of their &#8220;exclusive&#8221; post, MN Publius claimed that Demmer was currently being sued when in fact, this matter had been resolved over ten years&nbsp;ago.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not taking a side in the GOP battle to replace Congressman Walz. But I will take a stand against liberal bloggers who publish material used to threaten and intimidate people to end their campaigns. The bloggers behind MN Publius should be embarrassed for unknowingly being associated with the threats against a&nbsp;legislator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13762</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13762</guid>
		<description>Take that Mikey!!!

You should know better than to take on Ollie Ox!!! :) Credibility is at play here and the Ox has that!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take that&nbsp;Mikey!!!</p>
<p>You should know better than to take on Ollie Ox!!! <img src='http://mnpublius.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Credibility is at play here and the Ox has&nbsp;that!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ollie Ox</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13758</link>
		<dc:creator>Ollie Ox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13758</guid>
		<description>As Demmer himself said in the other article at the PB:

Demmer said he suspects the effort originates in Republican circles, because he&#039;s not even the endorsed candidate to oppose Democrat Walz yet. He said he received a call from a Republican in Washington, an apparent ally, who had received a package....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Demmer himself said in the other article at the&nbsp;PB:</p>
<p>Demmer said he suspects the effort originates in Republican circles, because he&#8217;s not even the endorsed candidate to oppose Democrat Walz yet. He said he received a call from a Republican in Washington, an apparent ally, who had received a&nbsp;package&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ollie Ox</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13759</link>
		<dc:creator>Ollie Ox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s23139.gridserver.com/2008/02/randy-demmer-sued/#comment-13759</guid>
		<description>Wow--that&#039;s taking the post at Bluestem completely out of context; As Mr. Brodkorb fully well knows--my post discusses why those circulating the Demmer lawsuit material are probably Demmer&#039;s political adversaries within the Republican party.

As the MnPublius post above notes, Representative Demmer released his letter  yesterday.  This morning&#039;s Rochester Post Bulletin provides a good discussion of the way the material was spread.

&quot;A couple weeks ago, state Rep. Randy Demmer received an ominous call. It was a warning, delivered through an intermediary from Washington, D.C.: Drop your candidacy for U.S. Congress or information about a sexual harassment lawsuit settled a decade ago would be dredged up to damage your campaign.&quot;

&quot;On Tuesday, Demmer, a three-term state representative from Hayfield, decided to deal preemptively with the threat by going public, telling his story to the Post-Bulletin. He also has sent out hundreds of letters to the delegates and alternates who will endorse a Republican candidate to run against 1st District Rep. Tim Walz.&quot;

&quot;On Monday, the Post-Bulletin received an anonymous telephone tip with information about the sexual harassment suit filed in U.S. District Court against Demmer, the three NAPA Auto Parts stores he then owned and a store manager in 1995. The paper also received an anonymous e-mail on the subject.&quot;

Sounds like an internal Republican battle. Look closer to home, Mr. Brodkorb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;that&#8217;s taking the post at Bluestem completely out of context; As Mr. Brodkorb fully well knows&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;my post discusses why those circulating the Demmer lawsuit material are probably Demmer&#8217;s political adversaries within the Republican&nbsp;party.</p>
<p>As the MnPublius post above notes, Representative Demmer released his letter  yesterday.  This morning&#8217;s Rochester Post Bulletin provides a good discussion of the way the material was&nbsp;spread.</p>
<p>&#8220;A couple weeks ago, state Rep. Randy Demmer received an ominous call. It was a warning, delivered through an intermediary from Washington, D.C.: Drop your candidacy for U.S. Congress or information about a sexual harassment lawsuit settled a decade ago would be dredged up to damage your&nbsp;campaign.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;On Tuesday, Demmer, a three-term state representative from Hayfield, decided to deal preemptively with the threat by going public, telling his story to the Post-Bulletin. He also has sent out hundreds of letters to the delegates and alternates who will endorse a Republican candidate to run against 1st District Rep. Tim&nbsp;Walz.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;On Monday, the Post-Bulletin received an anonymous telephone tip with information about the sexual harassment suit filed in U.S. District Court against Demmer, the three NAPA Auto Parts stores he then owned and a store manager in 1995. The paper also received an anonymous e-mail on the&nbsp;subject.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds like an internal Republican battle. Look closer to home, Mr.&nbsp;Brodkorb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
