<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Laurie, Where are you? #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnpublius.com/2008/06/laurie-where-are-you-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/06/laurie-where-are-you-2/</link>
	<description>Tracking Minnesota Politics Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:17:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/06/laurie-where-are-you-2/#comment-17256</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 04:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MNpublius.com/?p=1306#comment-17256</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s not green screen, I&#039;d fire the crew for lighting the scene so poorly and opening it up for scrutiny. 

Plus, the cut away of the ring is really strange. What the hell was the point if not to try to scream, &quot;We&#039;re married! Really we are!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s not green screen, I&#8217;d fire the crew for lighting the scene so poorly and opening it up for&nbsp;scrutiny. </p>
<p>Plus, the cut away of the ring is really strange. What the hell was the point if not to try to scream, &#8220;We&#8217;re married! Really we&nbsp;are!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coleman Campaign Responds With Outtakes&#8201;&#8212;&#8201;Questions Answered, Thank&#160;You! &#124; MNpublius.com</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/06/laurie-where-are-you-2/#comment-17226</link>
		<dc:creator>Coleman Campaign Responds With Outtakes&#8201;&#8212;&#8201;Questions Answered, Thank&#160;You! &#124; MNpublius.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MNpublius.com/?p=1306#comment-17226</guid>
		<description>[...] I said in my earlier post: &#8220;Odds are that this is all just some funky camera work, but it just looks too awkward not to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I said in my earlier post: &#8220;Odds are that this is all just some funky camera work, but it just looks too awkward not to&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/06/laurie-where-are-you-2/#comment-17184</link>
		<dc:creator>karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 04:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MNpublius.com/?p=1306#comment-17184</guid>
		<description>Is that the same Dumpster (T) that Norm allegedly banged his head on while diving for a lamp Laurie threw out? Well, that was the &quot;official&quot; story anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that the same Dumpster (T) that Norm allegedly banged his head on while diving for a lamp Laurie threw out? Well, that was the &#8220;official&#8221; story&nbsp;anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach (the other one)</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/06/laurie-where-are-you-2/#comment-17183</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach (the other one)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MNpublius.com/?p=1306#comment-17183</guid>
		<description>Where are all the Republicans???  Don&#039;t you want to defend yourselves ie Norm on this post?  Why aren&#039;t you defending Bachmann on the posts below?  No opinions?  Just a little too selective in your posts I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are all the Republicans???  Don&#8217;t you want to defend yourselves ie Norm on this post?  Why aren&#8217;t you defending Bachmann on the posts below?  No opinions?  Just a little too selective in your posts I&nbsp;think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TEAM COLEMAM RELEASES STATEMENT ABOUT &#8220;GOOFY&#8221; BLOGGERS WHO CREATED &#8220;A CONSPIRACY THEORY&#8221; ABOUT THEIR NEW TV AD &#124; Minnesota Democrats Exposed</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/06/laurie-where-are-you-2/#comment-17182</link>
		<dc:creator>TEAM COLEMAM RELEASES STATEMENT ABOUT &#8220;GOOFY&#8221; BLOGGERS WHO CREATED &#8220;A CONSPIRACY THEORY&#8221; ABOUT THEIR NEW TV AD &#124; Minnesota Democrats Exposed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MNpublius.com/?p=1306#comment-17182</guid>
		<description>[...] ad released by Senator Coleman&#8217;s campaign yesterday. Blue man in a Red district,  MN Blue, MN Publius, The Mississippifarian, and Minnesota Independent to name a few, all strongly raised the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ad released by Senator Coleman&#8217;s campaign yesterday. Blue man in a Red district,  MN Blue, MN Publius, The Mississippifarian, and Minnesota Independent to name a few, all strongly raised the&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/06/laurie-where-are-you-2/#comment-17170</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MNpublius.com/?p=1306#comment-17170</guid>
		<description>&quot;...there&#039;s just no way to be sure given the quality of the YouTube clip.&quot;

You&#039;re being too generous here.  The video quality of the clip doesn&#039;t deter from the fact that the angle and framing on Laurie is way off.  That is obvious be it a grainy YouTuber or hi-def.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;there&#8217;s just no way to be sure given the quality of the YouTube&nbsp;clip.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being too generous here.  The video quality of the clip doesn&#8217;t deter from the fact that the angle and framing on Laurie is way off.  That is obvious be it a grainy YouTuber or&nbsp;hi-def.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/06/laurie-where-are-you-2/#comment-17159</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MNpublius.com/?p=1306#comment-17159</guid>
		<description>&quot;This ad is horrible because it pretends that they have a close relationship yet seemingly they were unable to even spend a day together to actually do the ad. That is downright weird.&quot;

I think Amuseinc (with whom I rarely agree) has the best explanation here.  How hard would it have been to just shoot the ad with the two of them in the same room?  The fact that they had to resort to video tricks to create a video of something as simple as a husband and wife talking in the kitchen is just pathetic. 

Maybe someone should edit in Jar Jar Binks having morning coffee with the Colemans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This ad is horrible because it pretends that they have a close relationship yet seemingly they were unable to even spend a day together to actually do the ad. That is downright&nbsp;weird.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think Amuseinc (with whom I rarely agree) has the best explanation here.  How hard would it have been to just shoot the ad with the two of them in the same room?  The fact that they had to resort to video tricks to create a video of something as simple as a husband and wife talking in the kitchen is just&nbsp;pathetic. </p>
<p>Maybe someone should edit in Jar Jar Binks having morning coffee with the&nbsp;Colemans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron J. Brown</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/06/laurie-where-are-you-2/#comment-17157</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron J. Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MNpublius.com/?p=1306#comment-17157</guid>
		<description>Apparently it&#039;s a big year for green screens in the GOP. Maybe the only problem with McCain&#039;s big speech on the night Obama clinched was that they forgot to put in the B-roll of mavericky things ... or Norm taking out the garbage. One of those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently it&#8217;s a big year for green screens in the GOP. Maybe the only problem with McCain&#8217;s big speech on the night Obama clinched was that they forgot to put in the B-roll of mavericky things &#8230; or Norm taking out the garbage. One of&nbsp;those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amuseinc</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/06/laurie-where-are-you-2/#comment-17156</link>
		<dc:creator>Amuseinc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MNpublius.com/?p=1306#comment-17156</guid>
		<description>This ad is horrible because it pretends that they have a close relationship yet seemingly they were unable to even spend a day together to actually do the ad. That is downright weird. It would have been preferable to rewrite the spot so talking to each other didn&#039;t matter, rather than this faked conversation. To avoid the greenscreen just have the conversation take place in two different rooms. I think I might have used a better actress than his actual wife if I was going that fake anyway. She can&#039;t deliver the line with enough warmth and conviction.

If Norm Coleman can&#039;t be truthful and without trickery about something as simple as his wife asking him to take out the garbage, what can we expect for complex government issues?

There are other issues from that hangdog expression to the odd &quot;yes, dear&quot; submission sounding response to the request. All in all, a good shot in the foot almost equal to the Kennedy spots that caused Klobuchar&#039;s positives to go up every-time they were run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This ad is horrible because it pretends that they have a close relationship yet seemingly they were unable to even spend a day together to actually do the ad. That is downright weird. It would have been preferable to rewrite the spot so talking to each other didn&#8217;t matter, rather than this faked conversation. To avoid the greenscreen just have the conversation take place in two different rooms. I think I might have used a better actress than his actual wife if I was going that fake anyway. She can&#8217;t deliver the line with enough warmth and&nbsp;conviction.</p>
<p>If Norm Coleman can&#8217;t be truthful and without trickery about something as simple as his wife asking him to take out the garbage, what can we expect for complex government&nbsp;issues?</p>
<p>There are other issues from that hangdog expression to the odd &#8220;yes, dear&#8221; submission sounding response to the request. All in all, a good shot in the foot almost equal to the Kennedy spots that caused Klobuchar&#8217;s positives to go up every-time they were&nbsp;run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dyna</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2008/06/laurie-where-are-you-2/#comment-17155</link>
		<dc:creator>Dyna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MNpublius.com/?p=1306#comment-17155</guid>
		<description>A campaign doesn&#039;t make an ad months before the race starts, reassuringly showing the candidate with spouse, unless they know that the candidate and spouse have effectively if not legally been divorced for years... And the public is wondering who all else the candidate has been sleeping with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A campaign doesn&#8217;t make an ad months before the race starts, reassuringly showing the candidate with spouse, unless they know that the candidate and spouse have effectively if not legally been divorced for years&#8230; And the public is wondering who all else the candidate has been sleeping&nbsp;with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
