After Coleman released the first TV negative attack ad of the season, the media responded:
WCCO: “Coleman Ad Takes Personal Swipes At Franken”:
The latest ad from the Norm Coleman campaign doesn’t focus on the issues but takes some more personal swipes at challenger Al Franken.
MPR: “Coleman, Franken turn up the heat in latest campaign ads”:
“They’ve resorted clearly here to misleading smear attacks,” said Franken campaign spokesman Andy Barr. “But I guess that’s predictable. They didn’t have much to say for themselves.”
Barr says it’s not true that Franken didn’t pay his taxes.
“As has been stated many, many, many, many times, Al and Franni paid taxes on every cent of their income,” said Barr. “They overpaid in some states. They underpaid it in others. It’s a mistake that’s been rectified. The idea that there was a nonpayment of taxes is just simply wrong.”
Strib: “Coleman ad addresses Franken’s personal issues”:
Republican Sen. Norm Coleman weighed in Wednesday with a deceptively genial TV ad that offhandedly thrashes Franken…
The ad doesn’t address Franken’s stands on issues, and his campaign Wednesday characterized it as a “misleading smear” attack by Coleman.
MNindy: “Coleman throws a gutter ball in latest bowling alley commercial”:
The Norm Coleman campaign shows its first public sign of fear in a new :30 spot released yesterday. “Why Not” is a shorthand review of the personal gaffes committed by Al Franken in the race to date. There was no question the race would come to this, but it seems telling that the Coleman campaign is justifying the nasty turn by claiming Franken “went negative” first by highlighting Coleman’s close ties to the Bush White House.
In any case, it’s funny to see three men in a bowling alley tutting over “pornography” like octogenarian church ladies.
UPDATE: MinnPost: “Dirty early: Senate campaign goes negative”:
You could say that this ad, and Franken’s current ad, reflects the desire of Franken to make the race about Coleman’s record and Coleman’s desire to make it about Franken’s lack of one.
Despite its humorous tone, the ad represents the first pure attack ad of the year, in the sense that it goes directly after Franken on a personal basis.
The Coleman campaign can’t talk about the issues. What would the ad have been like if they talked about the issues that actually matter to Minnesotans?
UPDATE: Fixed title of Strib story.





People Are Shouting
RSS