LA Times: Lots of no-shows expected at RNC

The list is getting so long, NRSC spokesperson Rebecca Fisher says ”it’s probably easier to say who is attending.” OUCH. My three favorites that all hit close to home:

Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens is awaiting trial on seven federal charges stemming from a corruption scandal.

His staff says he won’t attend because he is too busy campaigning for his eighth term.

Idaho Sen. Larry E. Craig also has reasons to avoid the Twin Cities. Craig pleaded guilty in August 2007 to a reduced misdemeanor charge arising from his arrest for allegedly soliciting sex from an undercover police officer in a restroom at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. His term is ending; he is not seeking reelection.

…and of course, if it was anywhere else, we already know what Coleman would do:

One incumbent Republican senator has no choice but to attend: Norm Coleman of Minnesota pushed to bring the GOP convention to his state and is scheduled to address the delegates.

But facing a stiff reelection battle, he now admits he’d rather be out campaigning.

“If the convention wasn’t in St. Paul, I wouldn’t be at the convention,” Coleman told Minnesota Public Radio.

Read the entire piece at the Los Angeles Times. I was at the RNC media party on Saturday night and there was a lot of buzz amongst local and national media about the no-shows, the protests, the police raids and of course the hurricane that is looking likely to hit hard. In fact, a reason CNN’s Anderson Cooper wasn’t at the party is because he changed his flight plans from Saint Paul to New Orleans.

Update: 14 hours later, more developments: George Bush and Dick Cheney are both no-shows and McCain is calling off most RNC events for day one to monitor the situation with hurricane Gustov. While it is a lose-lose situation any way you look at it, I think they’re making the right choice.

Post Tools: PrintThis PrintThis
Related Posts: Restless Readers Relax…House Republican Caucus: Moderates Need Not Apply #4Again With the Horse Race, or: Agre Met With TrippiInternal Republican Polling Shows Bachmann in Serious TroubleHappy Thanksgiving!

4 Responses to “LA Times: Lots of no-shows expected at RNC”


  1. 1 1 Fiona

    What is there to say? They are breaking up…can you hear them now? They are breaking up!

  2. 2 2 yoder

    They don’t really have a choice. They would be taking their chances that someone would take a picture of them partying while the Gulf Coast drowned again.

  3. 3 3 yoder

    I just wonder how much this could help or hurt St. Paul. On one hand they won’t have the influx of money from delegates going out, shopping, getting drunk and buying souvenirs.

    On the other hand the city should be able to pocket the excess from not having to pay as much overtime or have as many security people on hand. There will also be money from non-refundable reservations.

  4. 4 4 DantheMan

    It isn’t the short-term cash lift that they needed most, it is the exposure. Minneapolis / St. Paul needs to move up to the next tier of convention locales, and this was a way for thousands of media and movers-and-shakers to see what it had to offer. Many of them are still coming, but many are not now with Gustav.

    The timing of everything hurts the GOP convention, but also hurts our region. These opportunities don’t come around every year, or even every decade.

Comments are currently closed.