Monthly Archive for October, 2008

Another Lawsuit, Another Source, Same Funneling Of Money

MNpublius has been closely watching the Coleman-Kazeminy story all week. Out now, the latest installment:

A second lawsuit was filed Friday by minority shareholders who allege that a close family friend of Sen. Norm Coleman used a marine company in Texas to pay $75,000 to the senator via a Minneapolis insurance company where Coleman’s wife, Laurie, is an independent contractor. The suit attributes the allegations to a “confidential source.”

Hum. Another lawsuit? Another source?

The lawsuit is very similar to one filed earlier in the week in Houston by McKim. Both actions allege that Kazeminy told executives at Deep Marine that he wanted to provide financial assistance to the Colemans through an insurance consulting arrangement between Deep Marine and Hays Companies. But the second suit cites a “confidential source.” Kazeminy is a longtime friend and campaign contributor to Coleman.

…in a new wrinkle, Deep Marine’s former CEO, McKim, is named as a co-defendant with Kazeminy and several other individuals who were in positions of authority at the company.

That’s different… McKim is now the defendant? 

McKim’s lawsuit was based on a sworn statement from him that Kazeminy coerced him and others to make three $25,000 payments to Hays. The second suit, brought by FLI Deep Marine LLC and Bressner Partners LTD, attributes its allegations to a “confidential source.” The source allegedly was told by Kazeminy in 2007 that “we have to get some money to Senator Coleman” because the senator “needs the money.”

So a different lawsuit, where McKim is now a defendant, is alleging basically the exact same thing.

…he recalls how Kazeminy approached him and Deep Marine’s chief financial officer in 2007 with a directive to channel $100,000 to the senator via Hays.

“He said that the senator’s wife worked there and she could get the money to him,” McKim said. “I was kind of stunned. I was really shocked he would come out and say that so nonchalantly.”

At the time, the sea diving and underwater construction company that McKim founded in 2001 had no need for new insurance services, McKim said. The company was paying $1 million a year for coverage arranged through underwriters in London who specialized in underwater, offshore lines, he said.

McKim said he feared that Kazeminy would fire him if he didn’t go along…

So it looks like they’re ready to tell all…

He acknowledged that approving the first check puts him in a “spot.” McKim said he is willing to talk to any federal agency, including the FBI and U.S. attorney’s office, about money he alleges was paid by Deep Marine to Hays for work that was never performed.

Hum. At this point, I’d be surprised if the feds don’t knock on McKim’s door.

See the story at the Star Tribune.

UPDATE: The Pioneer Press writes on this case as well.

Erik Paulsen Rips Off TPT Footage, Gets Legal Action

As if the darkening of Ashwin Madia’s skin in a Republican ad wasn’t enough, Erik Paulsen refused to condemn it. On tape. In fact, he says he hasn’t watched TV since August and says he hasn’t even seen the ad. Erik Paulsen: have you really not seen the ads that are running involving your race? And you really don’t condemn it when your allies darken Madia’s skin in TV ads?

Talking about CD3 ads, I guess the campaign tailspin going on in Eden Prairie right now involves Team Paulsen using footage illegally:

In his most recent television campaign ad Paulsen uses footage of his opponent Ashwin Madia from a TPT show Almanac that aired earlier this month. This ad has appeared on local television outlets, Rep. Paulsen’s website and is posted on YouTube, TPT reports.

From a TPT press release (emphasis mine):

In previous campaigns, we have requested that candidates - Democrats, Independents and Republicans - cease use of similar material, and all have complied…Twin Cities Public Television has sent two formal requests to the Paulsen campaign to remove all TPT footage from their ad; as of today, that request has not been honored.We are therefore issuing this statement, taking appropriate legal action

Way to go, Team Paulsen.

How Long Have Reporters Been Working On This Story?

Coleman and his allies are labeling his money funneling story as an “11th hour attack.”

First of all, there’s a huge amount of hypocrisy when Coleman’s campaign files a frivolous, factually incorrect 11th-hour lawsuit against Franken that will go nowhere.

More importantly though, reporters and investigative journalists have been working on this for months, according to MNpublius sources. Remember that famous Cullen Sheehan press conference from October 8? This wasn’t just about suits. Reporters were already likely understanding the connections between Nasser Kazeminy and Hays, thus following the money. Hear the Pioneer Press’ Rachel E. Stassen-Berger:

What Happens When This Is Proven True?

MNpublius has been covering Norm Coleman’s ethics scandal closely and it begs the question: as this story continues to be investigated and if these allegations are true, which right now they look like they are, what would happen to Norm Coleman if he was actually re-elected? 

I believe there are four possible scenarios based on the code on filling a vacancy in the U.S. Senate:

1. If the next Senator is forced to vacate his seat between January 2009 and six weeks before the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November 2013, there’s a special election. That election would be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in the November following the vacancy. There will also be a primary at the regular primary time in even-numbered years and four weeks before the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of odd-numbered years. (The only exception to this is if the vacancy occurs withing six weeks of the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November, then it’s held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of the next year.)

In other words, If Coleman does a perp walk and is forced to resign in June of 2009, there will be a special election to fill the unexpired term on November 2 and a primary four weeks before. If Coleman does the perp walk and is forced to resign on October 22, 2009, the special primary would be held on the regular primary day in 2010 and the special general election would be held on the regular election day in 2010.

2. If the next Senator is forced to vacate his seat anytime after six weeks before the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November 2013, then there is no special election and the seat comes up next on election day 2014.

In other words if Coleman does a perp walk and is forced to resign in December 2013, the special primary would be held on the regular primary day in 2014 and the special general election would be held on the regular election day in 2014.

3. Between the time of the vacated seat and the special election the Governor may appoint a replacement who will serve until a replacement is elected in a special election.

For example, if Coleman does a perp walk and is forced to resign in December 2013, Governor Pawlenty will be able to appoint someone like, let’s say, Michele Bachmann or anyone he wants to to be Senator.

4. If the vacancy occurs during an election year, whomever wins on election day will fill the vacant seat immediately.

If Coleman does a perp walk and is forced to resign in December 2013, Pawlenty will be able to appoint anyone to the Senate, for example again, let’s say Bachmann. The special primary would be held on the regular primary day in 2014 and the special general election would be held on the regular election day in 2014, and when whatever Democrat presumably beats Bachmann wins the election would take over the term immediately.

Minnesota’s Own Ted Stevens: Whirlwind of Questions Surround Coleman’s $75K in “Secret Payments”

Days away from the race of his lifetime, Norm Coleman is being dogged in the media by questions surrounding a lawsuit detailing the secret funneling of $75K to the Coleman family. The Huffington Post provides a good summary:

The CEO of a major marine technology company is alleging that he was pressured by a friend and associate of Norm Coleman to secretly funnel tens of thousands of dollars to the Senator’s family.

Paul McKim, the founder and CEO of Deep Marine Technology, alleges in a civil suit that Nasser Kazeminy — a longtime Republican donor, friend of Coleman, and DMT shareholder — directed the company to send $75,000 to the Senator and his wife.

The transaction, which occurred in 2007, allegedly went as follows: DMT would make payments for services to Hays Company, even though no services would be rendered. Since Norm Coleman’s wife Laurie worked at Hays, that money would be given to her in the form of ‘salary.’

The lawsuit has produced a media frenzy with reports in The Huffington Post, Harper’s magazine, Politico, MN Indy, MinnPost, The Nation, and, of course, MNpublius.  Our local media has also been reporting on the matter (MPR, KSTP, and CityPages) but in a move that shouldn’t surprise me, yet is still extremely frustrating, the Strib has buried the story below the fold in the Metro section… yeah, you read that right.  Sigh.

Although the merits of the suit, obviously, have yet to be adjudicated, the plot thickened this morning with Politico’s report that accounting documents from Kazeminy’s company have been turned over to the Strib that show payments to Laurie Coleman:

They show a Kazeminy-controlled oil-rig servicing company paid “service fees” to the Mrs. Coleman’s employer, the Hays Companies. McKim served as the company’s CEO until last Friday.

(Here’s the link. The key pages are 29-33.)

The lawsuit brings forth a set of extremely important questions, especially given the similarities between this and Ted Stevens’ lawsuit:

“This is why [Sen]. Ted Stevens just got convicted,” said a Washington D.C.-based attorney. “If this is true and Kazeminy gave a gift — which includes money to a candidate’s family member — it doesn’t mean that you can’t take it, but you would have to report it on [your financial disclosure form]… If he knew about it, and of course, all of this has to be proven to be true, then yeah,” he could go to jail. [HuffPo]

Which further begs the question: If, God forbid, Coleman returns to the Senate and is convicted of what the suit alleges, will he follow his own advice (Coleman called for Stevens to resign) and resign from the Senate?  Let’s just hope that it doesn’t come to that and Coleman is ousted before he has to make that decision himself, because if the last few days have shown anything, Coleman’s decision making skills probably shouldn’t be trusted…

And in related news, the clip of Coleman running away from media questions surrounding this whole affair is rapidly approaching 30,000 views in a little over 24 hours. If this suit is as illegitimate as Coleman claims it is, why is he running from reporters?

Paulsen’s Environmental Record, What Gives?

Jeff Rosenberg provides good reminder over at MNCR this morning: Erik Paulsen has refused to come clean on his environmental record.  He’s refused to outline even basic positions such as whether he believes in global warming, but his record in the State House shows an anti-environment streak.  Check out MNCR for the full post:

We just can’t be sure whether Erik Paulsen believes in global warming, because he refuses to tell us. It wouldn’t surprise me at all if he didn’t: that would be right in line with his horrendous record on the environment. Paulsen consistently votes against bills that would reduce pollutants and emissions that contribute to climate change. He also regularly votes against stronger standards for renewable energy.

The worst part, though, is that Paulsen seems to know that 3rd district voters won’t like his views on the environment. As a seasoned career politician, he knows that he can only win by sweeping his real policies under the rug. He’s no moderate like Jim Ramstad was, but he hopes he can appear like one just long enough to fool you.

Another poll shows what we already know: The Senate race is as tight as a Bachmann-Bush Embrace

The results from a MPR/Humphrey-Institute poll shows Franken leading among likely voters by 41% to Coleman’s 37% with a 4.6% margin of error.  Barkley comes in third with 17% and 5% remain undecided.

If there’s one thing that these polls make me want to say, it’s this: VOTE PEOPLE!!! I don’t want anyone getting the false impression that the polls lately show that Franken’s going to walk away with it, quite the opposite.  While my gut says that he’s going to pull this off, being within the margin of error with 5% still undecided makes me nervous.  Functionally, that makes this a ground game, and while I’d like to find comfort in the overwhelming Obama support and GOTV effort in this state (and it does provide some comfort), I know that this is going to be a race that keeps my blood pressure high Tuesday night.

And let’s not forget the stakes here: Norm Coleman back in the Senate or not.  Coleman is one of the most embarrassing stains on Minnesota’s proud history of public servents; a wholly opportunistic, sleazy, scrupleless politician that will do anything to stay in power (including very shady campaign funding).  Or we can have a guy who took time out of his life whenever he got the chance to go on a USO Tour for the troops, who left a very lucrative career because he felt the need to put his money where his mouth is, and since has inspired thousands of Minnesotans.

Agree with the dichotomy I’ve presented or not, it’s absolutely essential that you get to the polls Tuesday.  If our participation levels are record and Coleman still gets reelected, that’s something I’ll just have to deal with, but if we lose this to complacency, it will be a much longer 6 years.

Politico: Ledger details payment to firm employing Laurie Coleman

From The Politico

A Texas businessman who claims he was forced to make $75,000 in secret payments to the wife of Minnesota Sen. Norman Coleman has produced documents showing cash transfers to an insurance firm that employs the senator’s wife Laurie.

A lawyer for Paul McKim — who is accusing Coleman pal Nasser Kazeminy of funneling cash to the Laurie Coleman — handed over internal accounting sheets to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune.

They show a Kazeminy-controlled oil-rig servicing company paid “service fees” to the Mrs. Coleman’s employer, the Hays Companies. McKim served as the company’s CEO until last Friday.

(Here’s the link. The key pages are 29-33.)

The documents, intended to bolster a lawsuit McKim filed Monday against Kazeminy over the latter’s handling of the company’s finances, includes an invoice for an April 2007 payment of $25,000 to the Hays company and a wire transfer showing the payout.

The Media on Republicans Altering Madia’s Skin Color

Two days ago, KARE 11 ran their story on how Republicans have darkened Ashwin Madia’s skin color in an ad attacking him. Now a lot of others are digging into this story more:

Daily Kos: MN-03: More Republican Ugliness

Star Tribune: Fun with Photoshop

City Pages: Paulsen campaign accused of darkening Madia’s skin in TV ad

Crooks and Liars: NRCC Darkens Ashwin Madia’s Face In Ads

Wall Street Jorunal: TV Ad Stirs Controversy in Minnesota House Race:

“It might be possible to dismiss these actions as a customary, yet unfortunate aspect of negative advertising,” said Eric S. Fought, associate communications director of the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor party. But he said that he believed viewers would “know what Paulsen and his allies intended with darkening the images of Madia.” The Paulson campaign didn’t return calls.

PPP: Obama, Franken Lead

Public Policy Polling, a new polling outfit that had a pretty good track record in the Presidential primaries this year, is out with a poll of Minnesota.  Here are the numbers:

Obama - 57%
McCain - 41%

This conforms with other large Obama leads in other recent polls (the Illinois Senator was up 19, 12 and 8 points in the three most recent statewide surveys).

Franken - 45%
Coleman - 40%
Barkely - 14%

This race is just too close to call.  Coleman had a lead in the Rasmussen (2 points) and Mason-Dixon (6 points) polls that just came out.  MPR hasn’t released the Senate numbers from their latest poll, but judging by the massive Obama lead (56-37 over McCain) I bet they’ll show Franken with an edge.  Guess we’ll just have to let them count the votes on this one.

Star Tribune: Suit alleges ally funneled $75,000 to Colemans

There’s a lot more to this, but for now, the Star Tribune publishes the first part of this developing story:

A Texas businessman has filed a lawsuit alleging that Minnesota multimillionaire Nasser Kazeminy used his Houston marine company to funnel $75,000 to Sen. Norm Coleman last year via a Minneapolis insurance company that employs the senator’s wife.

If you’re new to this story, here’s the background: What Is Norm Coleman Running From?The Star Tribune Needs To Tell The Story About Coleman & Kazeminy

Sabato and Novak: Tinklenberg and Madia Have The Edge

Larry Sabato is a professor at the University of Virginia and a renowned election prognosticator.  The Evans-Novak Political Report is a conservative publication formerly run by Bob Novak.  Both put out election forecasts today and both see El Tinklenberg and Ashwin Madia winning next Tuesday.

The ENPR prediction is particularly noteworthy because it has become (especially since Novak’s retirement earlier this year) largely a repository of right wing talking points.  If even ENPR thinks Paulsen and Bachmann are going to lose, they probably are.

On the Senate side, ENPR predicts a Franken win but Sabato sees Coleman hanging on.  I think the race is a jump ball, though this developing story could put a finger on the scale…

The Star Tribune Needs To Tell The Story About Coleman & Kazeminy

Now we know what Norm Coleman was running from. This is media catnip right now:

Minnesota Independent: Latest Coleman & Kazeminy connection: The Star Tribune needs to tell the story

The Nation: Lawsuit Targets Major Coleman Donor

The Nation: PDF of Lawsuit (Relevant parts start on page 10)

Update: Huffington Post: Court Docs: GOP Donor Secretly Funneled $75k To Coleman Family

Update: MinnPost: Speculation swirls around lawsuit alleging indirect payments to Coleman

Update: The Politico: Lawsuit: Coleman’s wife received $75,000 in payments

Update: Harper’s Magazine: More Mystery on Senator Coleman and His Donor Friend

The short of it:

In March 2007, Kazeminy began ordering the payment of corporate funds to companies and individuals who tendered no goods or services to DMT for the states purpose of trying to financially assist United States Senator Norm Coleman of Minnesota. In March 2007, Kazeminy telephoned B.J. Thomas, then DMT’s Chief Financial Officer. In that conversation, Kazeminy told Mr. Thomas that “US Senators don’t make [expletive deleted]” and that he was going to find a way to get money to Coleman and wanted to utilize DMT in the process…Kazeminy told Mr. McKim that he [Kazeminy] would make sure there was paperwork to make it appear as though the payments were made in connection with the legitimate transations, explaining further that Senator Coleman’s wife, Laurie, worked for the Hays Companies, an insurance broker in Minneapolis, and that the payments could be made to Hays for insurance. When Mr. McKim made further objections, Kazeminy repeatedly threatened to fire Mr. McKim, telling him “this is my company” and that he and Thomas had better follow his orders in paying Hays. Subsequently, Kazeminy caused Hays to produce a document entitled “Disclosure of Service Fees” which purported to legitimize the basis of the payments to be made to Hays by DMT.

In other words, the same guy that was allegedly buying Norm his suits was also funneling large sums of money through one of his companies to Norm Coleman through his wife.

This is not unlike Ted Stevens’ case.

UPDATE: Brian Melendez, Chair of the Minnesota DFL released a statement:

These allegations of criminal behavior are serious and deeply troubling. The Plaintiff has verified those allegations — meaning that he will go to jail if he’s lying. Senator Coleman has a duty to the people of Minnesota to explain why those allegations aren’t true before the voters go to the polls on Tuesday.

“Positive” Coleman Campaign Engages In Frivolous Lawsuit Stunt

I just watched The UpTake’s stream of Coleman’s press event today at the Capitol. As expected, Coleman launched his fourth attempt to sue an opponent in a frivolous lawsuit.

This time, it is about a campaign ad Franken that illustrated how corrupt Norm Coleman is. In the press conference, Mark Drake disputed that Coleman wasn’t the 4th corrupt Senator with CREW. He sited that Coleman only earned a “dishonorable mention” and is not in the “top 20.” Well, let’s take a look at that list:

Now count how many SENATORS you see on that list. Who ranks 4th? The ad is legit. Nice try, Team Coleman.

The other claim is that he is “living almost rent-free in a Million dollar home.” Well, I do not dispute that it could be a subjective statement. But, if you were renting a room shared with an office of FLS Connect and paying only $600 a month where you could trade rent for furniture and have no problem paying late all while getting free utilities… everyone I know in Washington absolutely considers that “almost rent-free.”

Team Coleman did not dispute other parts of the ad, such as his corruption with big oil and his 52 free trips paid for by special interests.

The best part, is that they are filing it today where it is almost impossible that any action could be taken before the election… my guess is because they know if a conclusion came before the election it would backfire.

A fun but desperate stunt.

UPDATE: MinnPost has more, including video from The UpTake.

UPDATE: Huffington Post has more analysis of this situation.

What Is Norm Coleman Running From?

Remember all the weird buzz about Norm Coleman suing yesterday? One of the stories I kept hearing was how Norm Coleman was running away from some reporters’ questions in Saint Cloud at an event with Michele Bachmann.

A dedicated reader pointed me to a video that was just posted online. It looks like Star Tribune reporters Paul McEnroe and Tony Kennedy had some questions to ask that Norm Coleman raced away from. It is a little odd that investigative journalists from the Star Tribune would be showing up at an event in Saint Cloud to catch Coleman now. Obviously this is something someone thinks is important:

They are asking about some lawsuit where Nasser Kazeminy apparently helped Norm Coleman’s wife get $75,000. 

If you know any more details about this, please send me a tip.