Comments on: Team Coleman Coordinates Another Negative NRSC Ad

By: Provenza

Provenza — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:19:18 +0000

PF4aWG-
Your list of endorsements has already been posted by others on MNPublius and MDE. I’m sure it has been posted elsewhere. However, no one has posted documentation as to how to get this information.

There are people who are very interested in how this list got out. Particularly, those at the Star Tribune. In a discussion I had with a candidate last night, the candidate contacted the Star Tribune and found out that they had not made any decisions about endorsements for those races yet. The candidate said those at the Star Tribune were unhappy.

I would like an end to this confusion.

By: lojasmo

lojasmo — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:43:55 +0000

PF4aWG-

This election is not about kicking out incumbents. It is about changing the direction of our nation, which has been hijacked by a republican band of thugs over the last eight years.

By: Franken v. Coleman: The 18% Barkley Factor and What’s at Stake « The Raabe Review

Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:35:56 +0000

[…] swinging - with dirty bricks. Coleman recently claimed he has ended his negative campaigning, but his actions reveal […]

By: Max

Max — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:16:01 +0000

Sorry, didn’t mean to have you step in a trap of your own words, like MB.

By: amuseinc

amuseinc — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:04:17 +0000

And if the moron could get it through his head that it is a Republican administration that the word “Change” is being referenced it might help. May I note that the “Change” message is coming from both Presidential campaigns and not from the state campaigns. We like a DFL legislative branch and look forward to having DFL governor in the next election.

It’s called writing folks and when you do it right there is confusion.

By: Zach

Zach — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:19:20 +0000

PF4AWG - Are they all white? Maybe it’s cause they are all white.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:43:00 +0000

Then I make a typo and goof up..ugh. Obviously it should read. “In a race where the incumben is NOT running, there are no challengers to endorse…hence..it is not an option”.

Now that I am done displaying my more typing skills, I’m curious on how people think supporting the status quo is really change.

By: Pretty Fly 4 A White Guy

Pretty Fly 4 A White Guy — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:41:12 +0000

It’s called reading folks. Get a clue. Here is my quote in case you are too lazy to scroll up and look at it.

If this election is all about CHANGE, then why is the Star Tribune endorsing all incumbents and no challengers to incumbents?

Clearly I am referencing that the Strib is endorsing all incumbents and no challengers to incumbents in the races where an incumbent is running again. In a race where the incumbent is running, there are no challengers to endorse…hence…it is not an option.

Interesting that you won’t argue the point. That in an environment for CHANGE… you really want the status quo.

By: amuseinc

amuseinc — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:20:57 +0000

Um dumb shit, that’s not what you said in your first post. Either clearly comment or don’t get snippy when your miscommunication is the problem.

By: Pretty Fly 4 A White Guy

Pretty Fly 4 A White Guy — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:15:28 +0000

Max -
There are 12 seats they are endorsing in. In all 7 races where there is an incumbent, they endorse the incumbent….none of the challengers.
In the 5 open seats they…of course… don’t endorse an incumbent.

Get your facts straight before you start talking about stuff you don’t understand.