I have found out that my post was taken down by the site administrator at True North after numerous calls/messages from Michael Brodkorb.
I asked the administrators of True North about Repya’s allegations. Here is their reply:
Mr. Brodkorb had nothing to do with our decision. No one had contact with Brodkorb on this subject or on this post. We as the editors of TrueNorth felt it was not the type of post we think True North is here for. It is rare that we pull any posts down, but from time to time some posts happen to be put up on TN that are better suited on an individual’s blog, not on a website with such a large and variety of contributors who may or may not agree.
I also asked Michael Brodkorb about Repya’s allegations:
I didn’t have anything to do with the post being removed from True North and the independent statement from the site’s administrators verify that.
“We as the editors of TrueNorth felt it was not the type of post we think True North is here for.”
No, True North reserves its precious web space for ugly racist spewing.
Your “unbiased” opinion, right? You’re full of shit.
“The Truth”
In your opinion, I’m guessing, people who disagree with you on issues are fascist marxist communist acornist leftist socialist abortionist racists.
Am I right?
I’m also guessing you believe True North is 100% correct on every issue, everyone else is 100% incorrect, and there is no middle ground.
Great Job!!
Who is Michael Brodkorb? :-)
Unfortunately Joe has his “facts” wrong
Oh for the love of Mike…
It has been pointed out that Republicans have all the fairness and manners of cannibals…
And the Democrats have all the intelligence of turds….
LOLOLS
Great Job Minnesota Republican blogger “The Truth (in a dittoheads world)”
How many turds are there in the United States, in your opinion?
72 million perhaps?
There was a miscommunication. True North made an editorial decision. No slight to Col. Repya was intended or conveyed.
Oh, Karl? “racist spewing?” You’re lying again.
It’s a bad habit with you. You should stop, little fellow.
Zack,
…had been taken down by the site’s administrator without his knowledge or permission:
The “editors” at TN don’t need permission to take a piece down if it’s outside the site’s editorial direction.
We’ve valued Col. Repya’s contributions to True North (as to his nation, his state and his party), and hope to do so in the future.
oh, Karl? Yep. You’re still a liar.
Hmmm….difficult decision here.
LTC Repya, decorated war hero; Mitch Berg, 1280 “Patriot” “radio personality.”
Put me down as believing Colonel Repya - but only on the basis of reputation.
Of course, Mitch’s claiming on his radio show that Paulsen ran as a conservative has NOTHING to do with the decision…..
“We at True North will tolerate no dissension! Different opinions and new ideas only muddy the waters of our founding principles. True North will never waver from the principles that alienate the vocal minority of ultra-conservative extremists. New ideas are just too scary for us.”
“We at MANY liberal blogs block ips and delete posts of ANYONE who says anything not worshiping socialist/marxist philosophy” “Opinions supporting our Founding Fathers only muddy the waters of our philosophy of hammering everyone down to the same mediocre level of existence.” Talk about infighting, how about them HRC vs Obama nutjobs? Now there’s a battle of two wings of an insane asylum.
“The Truth”
“Talk about infighting, how about them HRC vs Obama nutjobs? Now there’s a battle of two wings of an insane asylum.”
Speaking of which, how did “Operation Chaos” work out for you, dittohead?
As much as I admire LtC Repya and I supported him for GOP chair, I too agreed that taking down the post was the right thing to do. The post was nothing but unfounded rumor and allegation and ALL of the Founders (not just Mitch) decided that the right thing to do was to take it down. It has been done before for the same reasons!
ALL True North contributors are there as “guests” (if you will). While we don’t ask much of our guests, we do ask that the rumor mongering be kept off the site unless there is some hint at proof that the rumor could have legs. This post had absolutely nothing other than one man’s feelings on the subject and therefore it came down.
Sorry to burst your bubble but there is simply no “there” there. LL
Mitch Berg callin’ Karl Bremer a liar - shoot, callin’ ANYONE a liar - sure seems to me to be projection.
Why would I say that?
This one should explain… http://www.mnblue.com/node/2017
Tommy,
1) “Argument by Authority” is a logical fallacy.
2) Adjust your tinfoil.
3) MNBlue? Hahaha! That kills me.
As re: the flap on True North (which, lest we forget, is the subject): it’s basically a dead issue. More to come on TN later on.
Y’all will have to find something new to titter about.
The Logic Of Mitch Berg, on “The Patriot.”
Mitch: “I - I’m the one that asks the questions, thank you very much. (click! hangs up on caller) Miles in Toronto…your question or comment please?”
This is from the December 20th, 2008 show, where Mitch tries to shift the goal posts. Mitch claimed Paulsen ran as a “conservative” - but shifted to, basically, “well, he wasn’t as moderate as Rammer, so there!”
Mitch is just another example of why reasonable people cannot reasonably trust GOPers to tell the truth.
But, hey! He’s been trained well; he can still regurgitate the ol’ “tin foil” line for defensive deflection.
Is that Mitch “dirt eating pagans” Berg?
Lady Logician, do you miss your Prior Lake haunt?
Berg defended the Dirt Worshipping Heathens post on Anti-strib: http://anti-strib.blogspot.com/2007/10/dirt-worshipping-heathens.html
When Mitch Berg isn’t defending someone calling Native Americans “dirt-worshipping heathens,” he’s living like one. Ask the City of St. Paul
Eva, which one of the commentors is Berg?
What I meant is that Berg DEFENDED Eberly’s rant:
Good comment on DU on this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=160x27642
Neanderthal blogger Mitch Berg still defends the racist slime
Berg says Tracy Eberly’s racist crap must be read in the proper context to understand it, which evidently the librul rubes don’t. Sure thing, Berg. Who will you be defending next — holocaust deniers?
http://www.shotinthedark.info/wp/?p=1602
The intellectually challenged Berg says — So read Eberly’s piece. I did. For the first time. I didn’t like it much, and don’t agree with it. Of course, I understand where it comes from - and it’s not racism.
To know that, of course, the reader would need to know the context of the story as well as the pull-quotes Bremer has elected to highlight.
DU is a slimepit. DU only allows posts that are worship socialist/marxist ideals or nuking anyone who does not. I love the smell of democrat stupidity in the morning…
Wow, I love how well your represent the typical Republican blogger, “The Truth (in your opinion)”
Keep up the outstandingly dittoheaded comments.
Great Job!!
I wonder how the bulk of the GOP feels about Berg? Do they know he exists? I wonder who in the GOP would defend the “dirt worshipping pagan” screed as accurate? GOP, thy name is Berg. Try and sell that.
A hilarious moment from GOP on GOP Action: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0CMgcCOoG8
Must have just gotten out of jail to get this excited over a thread from 5 months ago. Anybody who names themselves “The Truth” has never been within a country mile of it.
Wanna run for governor as a Republican?