<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court: &#8220;No systemic problem of disenfranchisement&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnpublius.com/2009/02/court-no-systemic-problem-of-disenfranchisement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/02/court-no-systemic-problem-of-disenfranchisement/</link>
	<description>Tracking Minnesota Politics Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:13:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Holly Cairns</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/02/court-no-systemic-problem-of-disenfranchisement/#comment-32702</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly Cairns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=4574#comment-32702</guid>
		<description>Did anyone see Senator Al with Tom Hauser this week?  Actually, last week?  I saw a rebroadcast this weekend.

Ack!  Finger pointing Tom really badgered by asking the same question four times (he didn&#039;t like Sen Al&#039;s answer the first three times, apparently).

Talk about tension.  Thank God Hauser didn&#039;t moderate the Rochester debate.  What Republican slant!

Meanwhile, no representation, yet.  Can&#039;t our State legislators clarify they want Richie to appoint/ issue a writ to fill the vacancy?  We need SOMEONE in there (and the recount did show Senator Franken to have won the election...)  

HELLO!  Representation!  Want it now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone see Senator Al with Tom Hauser this week?  Actually, last week?  I saw a rebroadcast this&nbsp;weekend.</p>
<p>Ack!  Finger pointing Tom really badgered by asking the same question four times (he didn&#8217;t like Sen Al&#8217;s answer the first three times,&nbsp;apparently).</p>
<p>Talk about tension.  Thank God Hauser didn&#8217;t moderate the Rochester debate.  What Republican&nbsp;slant!</p>
<p>Meanwhile, no representation, yet.  Can&#8217;t our State legislators clarify they want Richie to appoint/ issue a writ to fill the vacancy?  We need SOMEONE in there (and the recount did show Senator Franken to have won the&nbsp;election&#8230;)  </p>
<p>HELLO!  Representation!  Want it&nbsp;now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loonwalk</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/02/court-no-systemic-problem-of-disenfranchisement/#comment-32424</link>
		<dc:creator>loonwalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=4574#comment-32424</guid>
		<description>Some comments really are aggressive and yet so under-justified. 
First, here&#039;s a link about what Republicans have been about regarding elections:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PX_PZYXy-UU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUU4FCsp_Xw

Style of communication is something everyone should look up to help understand each other. Wikipedia, Google is fine. 
Another recent source says the types are: expert, romantic, warrior, and mastermind. 
These described as the dominating communication style (most skilled at and prefer to use upon meeting people) with secondary styles resorted to, down to the style least skilled at and most exhausting.
Then, Wiki &quot;thinking-fallacies&quot; or &quot;group think&quot;... I&#039;d like to see some nice people grow a little while they&#039;re on my field of vision here. Would you do that for me so I can like you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some comments really are aggressive and yet so under-justified.<br />
First, here&#8217;s a link about what Republicans have been about regarding&nbsp;elections:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PX_PZYXy-UU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PX_PZYXy-UU</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUU4FCsp_Xw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUU4FCsp_Xw</a></p>
<p>Style of communication is something everyone should look up to help understand each other. Wikipedia, Google is fine.<br />
Another recent source says the types are: expert, romantic, warrior, and mastermind.<br />
These described as the dominating communication style (most skilled at and prefer to use upon meeting people) with secondary styles resorted to, down to the style least skilled at and most exhausting.<br />
Then, Wiki &#8220;thinking-fallacies&#8221; or &#8220;group think&#8221;&#8230; I&#8217;d like to see some nice people grow a little while they&#8217;re on my field of vision here. Would you do that for me so I can like&nbsp;you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EPDem</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/02/court-no-systemic-problem-of-disenfranchisement/#comment-32415</link>
		<dc:creator>EPDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=4574#comment-32415</guid>
		<description>According to Politico, Norm was in Washington this past week at a big fundraiser held by the National Republican Senatorial Committee, which will help him keep his legal challenges going and then on to the appeals process.  When John Cornyn, who chairs the NRSC, was asked how long Norm should keep going, he was quoted as saying, &quot;However long it takes...He realizes how important retaining this seat is to us.&quot;  Obstuction and more obstruction - that is the Republican way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Politico, Norm was in Washington this past week at a big fundraiser held by the National Republican Senatorial Committee, which will help him keep his legal challenges going and then on to the appeals process.  When John Cornyn, who chairs the NRSC, was asked how long Norm should keep going, he was quoted as saying, &#8220;However long it takes&#8230;He realizes how important retaining this seat is to us.&#8221;  Obstuction and more obstruction - that is the Republican&nbsp;way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EPDem</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/02/court-no-systemic-problem-of-disenfranchisement/#comment-32414</link>
		<dc:creator>EPDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=4574#comment-32414</guid>
		<description>According to Politico, Norm was in Washington this past week at a big fundraiser held by the National Republican Senatorial Committee, which will help him keep his legal challenges going and then on to the appeals process.  When John Cornyn, who chairs the NRSC, was asked how long Norm should keep going, he was quoted as saying, &quot;However long it takes...He realizes how important retaining this seat is to us.&quot;  Obstuction and more obstruction - that the Republican way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Politico, Norm was in Washington this past week at a big fundraiser held by the National Republican Senatorial Committee, which will help him keep his legal challenges going and then on to the appeals process.  When John Cornyn, who chairs the NRSC, was asked how long Norm should keep going, he was quoted as saying, &#8220;However long it takes&#8230;He realizes how important retaining this seat is to us.&#8221;  Obstuction and more obstruction - that the Republican&nbsp;way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CMan</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/02/court-no-systemic-problem-of-disenfranchisement/#comment-32413</link>
		<dc:creator>CMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=4574#comment-32413</guid>
		<description>Doubt it! I don&#039;t see a quick resolution. Besides, we have a lot of obstructing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doubt it! I don&#8217;t see a quick resolution. Besides, we have a lot of obstructing to&nbsp;do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/02/court-no-systemic-problem-of-disenfranchisement/#comment-32410</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=4574#comment-32410</guid>
		<description>Now that the obstructionist GOP&#039;ers have lost and the stimulus bill will be signed by President Obama on Tuesday, Norm&#039;s vacancy is no longer necessary.  Watch this drama come to a swift and abrupt end as Norm&#039;s money pipeline gets shut down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that the obstructionist GOP&#8217;ers have lost and the stimulus bill will be signed by President Obama on Tuesday, Norm&#8217;s vacancy is no longer necessary.  Watch this drama come to a swift and abrupt end as Norm&#8217;s money pipeline gets shut&nbsp;down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/02/court-no-systemic-problem-of-disenfranchisement/#comment-32402</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=4574#comment-32402</guid>
		<description>MOre than likely if the Mn Supreme Court rule that AL Franken is the nest Srnator from Minnesota, Norm should do the right thing and not file an appeal. Why drag this out even further. This has already gone to the highest Court in the state.

Enough already!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MOre than likely if the Mn Supreme Court rule that AL Franken is the nest Srnator from Minnesota, Norm should do the right thing and not file an appeal. Why drag this out even further. This has already gone to the highest Court in the&nbsp;state.</p>
<p>Enough&nbsp;already!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/02/court-no-systemic-problem-of-disenfranchisement/#comment-32401</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=4574#comment-32401</guid>
		<description>MOre thannlikely if the Mn Supreme Court rule that AL Franken is the nest Srnator from Minnesota, Norm should do the right thing and not file an appeal. Why drag this out even further. This has already gone to the highest Court in the state.

Enough already!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MOre thannlikely if the Mn Supreme Court rule that AL Franken is the nest Srnator from Minnesota, Norm should do the right thing and not file an appeal. Why drag this out even further. This has already gone to the highest Court in the&nbsp;state.</p>
<p>Enough&nbsp;already!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CMan</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/02/court-no-systemic-problem-of-disenfranchisement/#comment-32399</link>
		<dc:creator>CMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=4574#comment-32399</guid>
		<description>&quot;And yes..it is “former senator Coleman”&quot;

For now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And yes..it is “former senator&nbsp;Coleman”&#8221;</p>
<p>For&nbsp;now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lojasmo</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/02/court-no-systemic-problem-of-disenfranchisement/#comment-32398</link>
		<dc:creator>lojasmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=4574#comment-32398</guid>
		<description>I love how the right wingers &quot;respect the judicial system&quot; and believe that republicans are &quot;going through the diligence that any candidate would&quot; when it could potentially benefit their backwards, destructive ideology, but spend the rest of their time complaining about &quot;trial lawyers&quot; and &quot;our litigious society&quot; when it&#039;s not republicans reaping potential benefit from the court system.

And yes..it is &quot;former senator Coleman&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how the right wingers &#8220;respect the judicial system&#8221; and believe that republicans are &#8220;going through the diligence that any candidate would&#8221; when it could potentially benefit their backwards, destructive ideology, but spend the rest of their time complaining about &#8220;trial lawyers&#8221; and &#8220;our litigious society&#8221; when it&#8217;s not republicans reaping potential benefit from the court&nbsp;system.</p>
<p>And yes..it is &#8220;former senator&nbsp;Coleman&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
