You might remember that on Wednesday, the Coleman team was caught having withheld notes given to them in early January by Pamela Howell, a Republican election worker in Minneapolis.
Today, emails reveal that team Coleman was intentionally trying to hide a witness.
If you want the day-to-day of what’s happening with the election contest, MinnPost, the Minnesota Independent and The UpTake have been doing great coverage. That said, following these sources I start feeling like I see the same headline every single day. It usually reads something close to “Coleman tried some other wacky thing and it was struck down yet again.” The Coleman legal team is proving over and over again that they do not have a case to overturn the certified results of how Minnesotans voted on election day.
How incompetent can Coleman’s lawyers be. You would think when they got caught doing this earlier in the week with this witness, they would fess up with ALL of the communication they’ve had with this witness that Franken’s lawyers didn’t know about.
The judges bought the excuse once this week, I hope they don’t buy it a second time.
Kitchen Sinks.
Its incompetence,or its arrogance to think they can get away with what they’ve tried.
Also shows that it has nothing to do with the will of the people & honest elections.
I think its because he has no downside. He lost.
So any impediment, any obstruction is as good as they’re going to get.
He’s pissing in your beer keg.
Is it unreasonable to see a difference between what is done for common good (the state)
vs what is done for personal reasons or causing trouble by being an impediment to progress?
Isn’t this just the peach? Thirty plus years as an election judge and (I’ve heard) self-proclaimed Republican. What other elections has she screwed up and then not written incidence reports about? That leaves me wondering if she has been helping certain candidates?
Why the secrecy and hiding of the witness? And, are there enough votes (on the one table that didn’t get labeled correctly) to sway the numbers to Coleman?
That is one upstanding former senator right there.