<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s going on with Sarah Palin?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnpublius.com/2009/07/whats-going-on-with-sarah-palin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/07/whats-going-on-with-sarah-palin/</link>
	<description>Tracking Minnesota Politics Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:41:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DantheMan</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/07/whats-going-on-with-sarah-palin/#comment-41289</link>
		<dc:creator>DantheMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=6104#comment-41289</guid>
		<description>Interesting take.

For as much as I&#039;ve defended the Palin family&#039;s right to privacy during this grotesque 9 months of a media frenzy, I&#039;m not a fan of Palin&#039;s leadership skills.  This audible (good word) proves it.

Unless she was 1) on the verge of a breakdown, 2) one of her children were on the verge of a breakdown, or 3) her marriage was days away from crumbling, I just can&#039;t see the logic in not serving out your term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&nbsp;take.</p>
<p>For as much as I&#8217;ve defended the Palin family&#8217;s right to privacy during this grotesque 9 months of a media frenzy, I&#8217;m not a fan of Palin&#8217;s leadership skills.  This audible (good word) proves&nbsp;it.</p>
<p>Unless she was 1) on the verge of a breakdown, 2) one of her children were on the verge of a breakdown, or 3) her marriage was days away from crumbling, I just can&#8217;t see the logic in not serving out your&nbsp;term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mockingbird</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/07/whats-going-on-with-sarah-palin/#comment-41287</link>
		<dc:creator>Mockingbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=6104#comment-41287</guid>
		<description>Yep:
&lt;strong&gt;Celebrity Spokemodel Sarah Palin!&lt;/strong&gt;

She doesn&#039;t seem to be going away &amp; retreating from the limelight after all!!!!!
She&#039;s did morning interviews on 3 channels --- Michael Jackson funeral day. A low profile.

Pawlenty may have to grab her coattails, just to be noticed in the room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep:<br />
<strong>Celebrity Spokemodel Sarah&nbsp;Palin!</strong></p>
<p>She doesn&#8217;t seem to be going away &amp; retreating from the limelight after all!!!!!<br />
She&#8217;s did morning interviews on 3 channels&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- Michael Jackson funeral day. A low&nbsp;profile.</p>
<p>Pawlenty may have to grab her coattails, just to be noticed in the&nbsp;room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattnotmatt</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/07/whats-going-on-with-sarah-palin/#comment-41273</link>
		<dc:creator>mattnotmatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=6104#comment-41273</guid>
		<description>I was away over the 4th and just watched this. I think this is actually a weird sideways critique of Pawlenty, who&#039;s announced that he&#039;s not seeking a third term, but running out the clock on his existing term and &quot;drawing down a paycheck&quot; at the same time. The timing would suggest that as well. The Governor of S. Carolina falls into scandal, Pawlenty&#039;s stock rises a little, Palin feels a little uncomfortable, so she &quot;calls an audible.&quot; I can see her raising this in Republican primary debates mere months from now.

If she is in fact trying to outflank Pawlenty with this maneuver, it&#039;s the least logical, most desperate thing she could attempt. But then again, she might&#039;ve picked it up from her running mate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was away over the 4th and just watched this. I think this is actually a weird sideways critique of Pawlenty, who&#8217;s announced that he&#8217;s not seeking a third term, but running out the clock on his existing term and &#8220;drawing down a paycheck&#8221; at the same time. The timing would suggest that as well. The Governor of S. Carolina falls into scandal, Pawlenty&#8217;s stock rises a little, Palin feels a little uncomfortable, so she &#8220;calls an audible.&#8221; I can see her raising this in Republican primary debates mere months from&nbsp;now.</p>
<p>If she is in fact trying to outflank Pawlenty with this maneuver, it&#8217;s the least logical, most desperate thing she could attempt. But then again, she might&#8217;ve picked it up from her running&nbsp;mate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DantheMan</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/07/whats-going-on-with-sarah-palin/#comment-41248</link>
		<dc:creator>DantheMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=6104#comment-41248</guid>
		<description>Malia Obama shouldn&#039;t have 11,600,000 hits either.  Leave the children of politicians alone.  Obama&#039;s, Palin&#039;s, everyone&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Malia Obama shouldn&#8217;t have 11,600,000 hits either.  Leave the children of politicians alone.  Obama&#8217;s, Palin&#8217;s,&nbsp;everyone&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/07/whats-going-on-with-sarah-palin/#comment-41244</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=6104#comment-41244</guid>
		<description>DTM your argument: 
&quot;Bristol Palin: 6,350,000 hits
Mitt Romney: 3,300,000 hits
Mike Huckabee: 2,200,000 hits

So why is the daughter of Sarah Palin more popular on the internet than the two runners-up in the actual nomination process? If I were Sarah Palin, I’d give my family some privacy as well.&quot; 

is absurd-- that happens for all politicians.  

Malia Obama has 11,600,000 hits-- why does the 11 year old daughter of the President have twice as many hits as the 18 year old daughter of the biggest train wreck in the country, and 5 times as many hits as my favorite evangelical? 

Sarah Palin can&#039;t hack it-- no matter how much Republicans may fantasize differently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DTM your argument:<br />
&#8220;Bristol Palin: 6,350,000 hits<br />
Mitt Romney: 3,300,000 hits<br />
Mike Huckabee: 2,200,000&nbsp;hits</p>
<p>So why is the daughter of Sarah Palin more popular on the internet than the two runners-up in the actual nomination process? If I were Sarah Palin, I’d give my family some privacy as&nbsp;well.&#8221; </p>
<p>is absurd&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;that happens for all&nbsp;politicians.  </p>
<p>Malia Obama has 11,600,000 hits&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;why does the 11 year old daughter of the President have twice as many hits as the 18 year old daughter of the biggest train wreck in the country, and 5 times as many hits as my favorite&nbsp;evangelical? </p>
<p>Sarah Palin can&#8217;t hack it&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;no matter how much Republicans may fantasize&nbsp;differently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DantheMan</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/07/whats-going-on-with-sarah-palin/#comment-41239</link>
		<dc:creator>DantheMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=6104#comment-41239</guid>
		<description>Google itself.  Just Google the name.  Google goes out and fetches any website that exists as of the search moment.  Doesn&#039;t matter if it was written in 1995, 2000, or yesterday, so I don&#039;t see the relevance of when Google came into being.  Hell, Jimi Hendrix has 12,000,000 hits and he was dead 25 years before Google was born.

Bristol Palin:    6,350,000 hits
Mitt Romney:      3,300,000 hits
Mike Huckabee:    2,200,000 hits

So why is the daughter of Sarah Palin more popular on the internet than the two runners-up in the actual nomination process?  If I were Sarah Palin, I&#039;d give my family some privacy as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google itself.  Just Google the name.  Google goes out and fetches any website that exists as of the search moment.  Doesn&#8217;t matter if it was written in 1995, 2000, or yesterday, so I don&#8217;t see the relevance of when Google came into being.  Hell, Jimi Hendrix has 12,000,000 hits and he was dead 25 years before Google was&nbsp;born.</p>
<p>Bristol Palin:    6,350,000 hits<br />
Mitt Romney:      3,300,000 hits<br />
Mike Huckabee:    2,200,000&nbsp;hits</p>
<p>So why is the daughter of Sarah Palin more popular on the internet than the two runners-up in the actual nomination process?  If I were Sarah Palin, I&#8217;d give my family some privacy as&nbsp;well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mockingbird</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/07/whats-going-on-with-sarah-palin/#comment-41212</link>
		<dc:creator>Mockingbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=6104#comment-41212</guid>
		<description>Is dtm making a case for Bristol Palin, or Sarah Palin?
I think he&#039;s confusing the two. Or conflating them.


Last I looked, it was SARAH Palin that was shooting off her mouth.

What is he saying?
Did I miss something?: Chelsea Clinton was not running for office either.
And that grasp that Google did not exist as an entity in the early 1990&#039;s is precious.

Google did not come into being until 1996 &amp; took a bit to get where it is today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is dtm making a case for Bristol Palin, or Sarah Palin?<br />
I think he&#8217;s confusing the two. Or conflating&nbsp;them.</p>
<p>Last I looked, it was SARAH Palin that was shooting off her&nbsp;mouth.</p>
<p>What is he saying?<br />
Did I miss something?: Chelsea Clinton was not running for office either.<br />
And that grasp that Google did not exist as an entity in the early 1990&#8217;s is&nbsp;precious.</p>
<p>Google did not come into being until 1996 &amp; took a bit to get where it is&nbsp;today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/07/whats-going-on-with-sarah-palin/#comment-41210</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=6104#comment-41210</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Bristol Palin, who has never run for office, has twice as many Google search hits than Chelsea Clinton, the Bush twins, and the Obama girls combined. &lt;/i&gt;

DtM, what&#039;s your source for this? 

Also, I would bet that anybody has more google hits than Chelsea had when her father was president, as Google didn&#039;t exist yet (at least in the mainstream). 

As for the reasons for her quitting, I&#039;m still waiting for the other shoe to drop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Bristol Palin, who has never run for office, has twice as many Google search hits than Chelsea Clinton, the Bush twins, and the Obama girls combined. </i></p>
<p>DtM, what&#8217;s your source for&nbsp;this? </p>
<p>Also, I would bet that anybody has more google hits than Chelsea had when her father was president, as Google didn&#8217;t exist yet (at least in the&nbsp;mainstream). </p>
<p>As for the reasons for her quitting, I&#8217;m still waiting for the other shoe to&nbsp;drop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NorthernMNer</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/07/whats-going-on-with-sarah-palin/#comment-41208</link>
		<dc:creator>NorthernMNer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=6104#comment-41208</guid>
		<description>Andrew Sullivan sums up this speculation nicely:

&quot;Can we all be grown up for a minute and concede something very simple? There are three explanations for the latest circus act: either Sarah Palin is so crazy she actually believes that what she just did is good for her political career; she has decided that her future is as a celebreality star and she&#039;s pursuing the lucrative Coulter-style, long legs and fascist farrago strategy; or, a scandal of monumental proportions is about to hit.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Sullivan sums up this speculation&nbsp;nicely:</p>
<p>&#8220;Can we all be grown up for a minute and concede something very simple? There are three explanations for the latest circus act: either Sarah Palin is so crazy she actually believes that what she just did is good for her political career; she has decided that her future is as a celebreality star and she&#8217;s pursuing the lucrative Coulter-style, long legs and fascist farrago strategy; or, a scandal of monumental proportions is about to&nbsp;hit.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mockingbird</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/07/whats-going-on-with-sarah-palin/#comment-41187</link>
		<dc:creator>Mockingbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=6104#comment-41187</guid>
		<description>OOOOOOh. Its a nice point, Nitro.
Doing what is normal, is now E-ville?: They tricked her by asking questions!!!

She makes herself sound ludicrous. She&#039;s done except as a headliner or opening act.
However, who would risk their candidacy on her mouth? If she is &quot;mavericky.&quot;

Let&#039;s not forget, she all but &lt;strong&gt;incited&lt;/strong&gt; crowds with obvious lies, etc. Without conscience.
Without apology.

When she played ruthlessly &amp; tries to kick everyone else in the balls,
she can&#039;t expect kindness &amp; warm feelings in return.

I have heard one positive about her: she&#039;s half a tick pleasanter than Michele Bachmann.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOOOOOh. Its a nice point, Nitro.<br />
Doing what is normal, is now E-ville?: They tricked her by asking&nbsp;questions!!!</p>
<p>She makes herself sound ludicrous. She&#8217;s done except as a headliner or opening act.<br />
However, who would risk their candidacy on her mouth? If she is&nbsp;&#8220;mavericky.&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not forget, she all but <strong>incited</strong> crowds with obvious lies, etc. Without conscience.<br />
Without&nbsp;apology.</p>
<p>When she played ruthlessly &amp; tries to kick everyone else in the balls,<br />
she can&#8217;t expect kindness &amp; warm feelings in&nbsp;return.</p>
<p>I have heard one positive about her: she&#8217;s half a tick pleasanter than Michele&nbsp;Bachmann.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
