<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlueCross BlueShield jacks up premiums, uses them to fight public option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnpublius.com/2009/10/bluecross-blueshield-jacks-up-premiums-uses-them-to-fight-public-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/10/bluecross-blueshield-jacks-up-premiums-uses-them-to-fight-public-option/</link>
	<description>Tracking Minnesota Politics Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:30:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dane</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/10/bluecross-blueshield-jacks-up-premiums-uses-them-to-fight-public-option/#comment-45999</link>
		<dc:creator>Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=7053#comment-45999</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nchc.org/facts/cost.shtml&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.nchc.org/facts/cost.shtml&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nchc.org/facts/cost.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.nchc.org/facts/cost.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dane</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/10/bluecross-blueshield-jacks-up-premiums-uses-them-to-fight-public-option/#comment-45997</link>
		<dc:creator>Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=7053#comment-45997</guid>
		<description>Just want to say, don&#039;t be fooled by that 38% growth in workers pay. Executive pay has skewed that statistic. 
 
Furthermore, here&#039;s some more fun reading!!! 
 
&quot;Without health care reform, small businesses will pay nearly $2.4 trillion dollars over the next ten years in health care costs for their workers, 178,000 small business jobs will be lost by 2018 as a result of health care costs, $834 billion in small business wages will be lost due to high health care costs over the next ten years, small businesses will lose $52.1 billion in profits to high health care costs and 1.6 million small business workers will suffer &#8220;job lock&#8220;&#8212; roughly one in 16 people currently insured by their employers.&quot; 
 
Small Business Republicans, tell us how opposing this plan helps those statistics. 
 
 
Regulation now! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just want to say, don&#039;t be fooled by that 38% growth in workers pay. Executive pay has skewed that&nbsp;statistic. </p>
<p>Furthermore, here&#039;s some more fun&nbsp;reading!!! </p>
<p>&quot;Without health care reform, small businesses will pay nearly $2.4 trillion dollars over the next ten years in health care costs for their workers, 178,000 small business jobs will be lost by 2018 as a result of health care costs, $834 billion in small business wages will be lost due to high health care costs over the next ten years, small businesses will lose $52.1 billion in profits to high health care costs and 1.6 million small business workers will suffer &ldquo;job lock&ldquo;&thinsp;&mdash;&thinsp;roughly one in 16 people currently insured by their&nbsp;employers.&quot; </p>
<p>Small Business Republicans, tell us how opposing this plan helps those&nbsp;statistics. </p>
<p>Regulation&nbsp;now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NorthernMNer</title>
		<link>http://mnpublius.com/2009/10/bluecross-blueshield-jacks-up-premiums-uses-them-to-fight-public-option/#comment-45995</link>
		<dc:creator>NorthernMNer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnpublius.com/?p=7053#comment-45995</guid>
		<description> 
&quot;Since 1999, premiums have increased a total of 131%, compared with 38% growth in workers&#039; wages and a 28% rise in inflation.&quot; 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketwatch.com/story/family-health-premiums-rise-5-in-2009-survey-2009-09-15&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.marketwatch.com/story/family-health-pr...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
So for those of you without calculators at home, this means that on average, premiums are going up at 13% pace per year in the period &#039;99-&#039;09.   
 
Health care reform, anyone? 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Since 1999, premiums have increased a total of 131%, compared with 38% growth in workers&#039; wages and a 28% rise in&nbsp;inflation.&quot; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/family-health-premiums-rise-5-in-2009-survey-2009-09-15" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/family-health-pr.." rel="nofollow">http://www.marketwatch.com/story/family-health-pr..</a>. </p>
<p>So for those of you without calculators at home, this means that on average, premiums are going up at 13% pace per year in the period&nbsp;&#039;99-&#039;09.   </p>
<p>Health care reform,&nbsp;anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
