Reconciliation was intended to be a narrow procedure to bring revenues and spending into conformity with the levels set in the annual budget resolution. But it quickly became much more. The 22 reconciliation bills so far passed by Congress (three of which were vetoed by President Bill Clinton) have included all manner of budgetary and policy measures: deficit reductions and increases; social policy bills like welfare reform; major changes in Medicare and Medicaid; large tax cuts; and small adjustments in existing law. Neither party has been shy about using this process to avoid dilatory tactics in the Senate; Republicans have in fact been more willing to do so than Democrats.
See the whole thing here.
By the way, a quick note for those of you who would love to stop hearing about reconciliation: So would I, but the fact is, this is the most important subject in national news right now. Let’s hope the Democrats will get this thing done so I can stop writing about it.


Reconciliation is a word that has positive connotations. I’m sure Frank Luntz would advise against allowing the Democrats to us a process represented by a happy word.
I’m sorry for being a broken record, but it keeps seeming like your most principled reason for using reconciliation is because the other guy did it first.
Bad reason. Bad reason for Welfare Reform. Bad reason for Contract with America. Bad reason for Health Reform.
A few of the things on that list actually are budget-related bills. That is what reconciliation is for, not this.