Archive for the 'CD3' Category

Page 2 of 11

Avista Capital Partners Endorsements For CD3, CD6

Even though I’ve been heavily cynical about the Star Tribune, I did want to note about their endorsements for tomorrow’s paper. David Brauer points out:

In the Sixth, editorialists avoid nuclear outrage by picking Tinklenberg. They weigh in for the first time on you-know-what; Bachmann’s “anti-America” paradigm “adds to the list of bizarre incidents and statements that undercut her credibility as a political leader.”

Even though the Star Tribune has gone far to the right, nobody in their right mind can endorse Bachmann. Interesting though, is that they absolutely destroy Erik Paulsen but cannot bring themselves to endorse Madia so they opt for a “non-endorsement“ instead:

But Paulsen’s endorsement interview was disappointing. His answers on energy, health care and foreign policy lacked depth, detail and vision. Paulsen performed better at debates, but did not make the case that he has the depth needed to be a strong, independent leader in Congress.

Paulsen was a fiscal and social conservative in the Legislature, voting for measures that this newspaper opposed. Why he’s casting himself as a moderate in this race is unclear. His conservative credentials are solid; he should have run on them.

Paulsen is farther right than the Star Tribune and they’re criticizing him for not running on his conservative credentials? They even point out how he’s trying to run as a moderate. While I am not at all surprised by the Star Tribune not endorsing Madia, the fact that they trash Paulsen so badly is rather telling.

Did Ramstad Whisper a Madia Endorsement?

Paul Schmelzer notices Jim Ramstad in the National Review Online saying the election is “going to be a tsunami.” In regards to a large Democratic win in November, Ramstad is likely correct. Schmelzer reads further: (emphasis mine)

Ramstad: “Republicans need to get back to governing from the center. We Republicans need to get away from the addiction to base politics. Karl Rove’s playbook isn’t working anymore.

That line could almost be perceived as an endorsement of the Democratic candidate in Ramstad’s 3rd Congressional District, where DFLer Ashwin Madia, a former Republican, is facing off against Erik Paulsen, who as a 14-year Minnesota legislator has consistently earned high scores from rightwing social conservative groups like Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, the Minnesota Family Council and the Taxpayer’s League of Minnesota. (Here’s Paulsen’s voting record.)

Not only is the Karl Rove playbook not working for Erik Paulsen, Schmelzer is correct to point out how absolutely unlike Ramstad Paulsen actually is.

Erik Paulsen’s Consultant and Friends Humiliating and Harassing Female DFL Staff

Remember it’s not Norm Coleman’s campaign and the NRSC that’s gone into the gutter of appalling and disgusting attacks: Erik Paulsen’s campaign reached a new low last night when their highest paid consultant, Michael Brodkorb, started defaming female DFL staffers with photos lifted from their personal Flickr accounts and insulting them by juxtaposing their personal photos and real names with cynical and sarcastic notes on how they should “stay classy” and how they’re “embarrassing” the Madia campaign.

Remember, this is the same creep that was stalking and videotaping himself harassing a woman in a Perkins parking lot at night after planting illegally placed signs next to Madia’s office. It’s the same guy who finds exploiting an eight-year-old girl in a negative attack ad “hilarious.”

In his recent set of three posts on Michael Brodkorb’s whisper campaign and MNGOP rumor mill headquarters, Minnesota Democrats Exposed, he “exposes” and links to photos of young women and asks his readers to question what “skinny b*tches for Madia” means to them.

It is unbelievably shameful for the former Communications Director of the MN GOP, the former Research Director for the MN GOP and a consultant to numerous state-wide campaigns to push a story with copied images of young female staffers of his opponent and framing them such a disgusting context.

On Minnesota Democrats Exposed, many times Michael Brodkorb will pose a “simple question” or a very short post while his commenters finish his thought so he doesn’t have to say the words himself. It’s a common way to spread rumors, lies and to frame conversations about a topic. In the recent three separate posts and threads, he fostered the following excerpts of conversation to describe the photographs:

“When did the DFL start pimping their daughters?” “DFL is now DFLP Democrat Farm Labor Pimps” “Do I think their management is pimping them? Yes, Absolutely yes.” “To be clear, the gal at the top of this page is kind of a babe.” “She’s cute. Is she single?” “I wonder. Do you think the Democrat party pays workinggrrlz comp. for it’s staff skanks?” “Madia for Congress: Hiring gorgeous women.” ”The Democrat party, and the Ashtray Madia campaign does not discriminate it’s skankery based upon gender, sexual orientation or fashion sense.” “Word to the wise, fellas: If Democrat skanks, or skinny b*tches for Madia show up at your fraternal orginization, wrap that rascal!”

There’s much worse that I won’t reprint here. Most of it is blatant objectification of DFL staffers and nothing to do with the campaign. Brodkorb even allows linking in the comments where people actively grabbed their own copies of the photos and labelled them such as “madiaskank2.jpg” to share with others. All while the top of the post and the names of some of the images contain the women’s real names.

Michael Brodkorb does not delete these comments and allows them to foster. He even linked his posts to another site that took his lead and took it farther by calling these women “street walkers” and “skanks.”

This disgusting activity by the Paulsen campaign’s consultant should never, ever have a place in Minnesota politics. What happens when these women try to find their next jobs? Will Erik Paulsen condemn this activity from his highest paid consultant or will he let it go like he did with the racist and bigot in the Minnesota House?

The Paulsen campaign should be absolutely ashamed they have allowed themselves to go this low and Erik Paulsen should condemn these actions.

Will Paulsen Condemn Racist and Bigoted Remarks From Other Republicans?

Even though the Erik Paulsen campaign has sure smelled of racism, I’m not going to flat out say that Erik Paulsen is a racist. What I will say, however, is that Erik Paulsen didn’t have a problem not condemning a racist and a bigot.

An ethics complaint was brought by eight representatives against Representative Arlon Lindner after he suggested during a March 10, 2003 House floor speech that gays and lesbians were not persecuted during the Holocaust: “It’s just been recently that anyone’s come out with this idea that homosexuals were persecuted [during World War II] to this extent.  There’s been a lot of rewriting of history.”

Lindner then spewed these disgusting remarks in justification (see video): “What I am trying to prevent is the holocaust of our children getting STDs, AIDS, and various other diseases… If you want to sit around and wait until America becomes another African continent, you do that, but I’m going to do something about it.”

The complaint was referred to the Ethics Committee where it died on a party-line tie vote.

On April 25, 2003, a resolution specifically stated that “Representative Lindner has to date refused to apologize or acknowledge any regret over the statements he has made.” The resolution declared that the House of Representatives “formally condemns the statements made by Representative Lindner.” The resolution instructed the Speaker of the House to remove Representative Lindner as Chairman of the Economic Development and Tourism Division for the remainder of the legislative session. Not a very nasty punishment, really. On a roll call vote, Erik Paulsen voted against the House resolution.

Even worse, during floor debate on the House resolution Paulsen defended Lindner’s comments. Paulsen decided to distribute handouts attacking democrats equating Lindner’s denial of certain aspects of the Holocaust to statements made by democrats regarding meetings between republican House members and african-american youth. Yeah.

Again, I’m not saying Erik Paulsen is a racist or a bigot, but what does it say when he won’t condemn those who are?

If faced with a similar situation in Washington, would Erik Paulsen play by the party line or would he condemn racist and bigoted comments?

New Madia Ad

Not sure how I missed this yesterday, but Madia has a new ad out (via MNCR):

Sound the Alarm! GOP Shifts Focus to 3rd; Spending Over $1 Million Through Election [Updated x2]

You know how we just noted with much fanfare that the NRCC is pulling their ads out of the 6th? Well, turns out now is not time for celebration because they, and the rest of the GOP, is refocusing just south of the 6th in the 3rd. In other words, the GOP is throwing all their resources at the 3rd in order to buy this race.

[UPDATE 2: The MN GOP buy is not just $110K, it’s $250K. And now that I think about it, where is all the money Ramstad has in his campaign coffers? To the best of my knowledge he has around a half million that he can’t do much with now, where’s that going? Maybe with all this money Paulsen can afford to buy his first positive ad…]

Polinaut just broke the news that the MN GOP is buying $110K $250K in ads next week for Erik Paulsen… $110,000 $250,000!!  But wait, it gets worse, the NRCC has 5 buys (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) for over $390K from yesterday through 28th… $390,375!!!!!  But you’re saying, “well, at least they’re stopping shy of election day.”  Hold on, it gets worse!  Erik Paulsen’s campaign itself is chipping in a cool $275K for ad buys up to November 4th… $275,000!!!  Does your head hurt yet?  Just wait, it gets worse!  Between the 28th and the 4th of November, the RNCC, hold your breath for this one, is spending $305K over 5 different buys… $305,225!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  (my head is exploding).

Without even factoring in the radio buys that the GOP and other Republican interest groups are running in the 3rd as we speak, the above brings the total for GOP major-player (sate party, NRCC, and Paulsen) ad buys to WELL over $1,000,000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Republicans are trying to buy this race from us.  They’ve seen Madia working his butt off and they’ve been unable to sell Erik Paulsen on his record, so they’ve turned to the last ditch option the GOP always turns to: break out the big-bucks and attack, attack, attack!  They’ve said he isn’t “one of us” (and we all know what they means), they’ve called him a traitor because of his “Discipline” ad, and Erik Paulsen even calls him a liar in all his TV ads (which, I might add, got a D rating by KSTP).

This race is in our grasp, but we can’t lie down and let the GOP swoop in and steal this one from us so close to the finish line.  Ashwin is being out-spent in this race now and he needs our help. Help Ash fight back!  Help us turn this red district blue!  Help us beat these faceless GOP forces!  Donate.  If there was ever a time, it’s now.

Added by Sean: I bumped this over Zack’s post because it deserves to be.

Added by Matt: I bumped this over Aaron’s post about the new Franken ads (they are really awesome though).

KSTP Gives Erik Paulsen a “D” on Honesty

MNpublius exposed the dishonesty of Paulsen’s latest ad before, but KSTP takes it even further:

View some of the source material yourself:

Erik Paulsen Ad: “Disturbing,” October 18, 2008
SD 42/43 Meeting, November 28, 2007
Brooklyn Park Candidate Forum, January 12, 2008

It’s a pretty rough situation when KSTP destroys an ad from a right-wing candidate. With Madia taking the high road, I’m not sure how Paulsen’s campaign can go up from here.

Erik Paulsen Lying Again During KSTP Debate

Erik Paulsen continued to spew his “inflammatory and misleading” arguments about taxes in the KSTP CD3 debate last night. He also has been intentionally mischaracterizing Ashwin Madia’s positions in a disgusting manner. Here’s one example:

Here’s all the original source material so you can see for yourself:
KSTP Debate: October 18, 2008
Erik Paulsen Ad: “Disturbing,” October 18, 2008
SD 42/43 Meeting, November 28, 2007

There’s many more examples as well.

By the way, I recommend watching the entire debate. It was a fantastic, positive performance by Ashwin Madia and wish that everyone in CD3 gets to see it. I haven’t been able to find it hosted on KSTP’s site, so let me know where it is and I’ll link to it. If they don’t post it, I will. (thank you commenter “berenike” for the KSTP URL)

MNpublius Exclusive: NRCC Buys TV Ad Time For Week Two

Remember how the NRCC pulled ads to help other candidates? Well, a source confirmed that the NRCC are coming back and bought up time for week two (Oct 20th-26th) in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul area to air ads. I guess they decided they need to spend money here now. Here’s the question though: Is it for CD3, CD6 or, dare I say it… CD2?

VoteVets Slams Paulsen and Kline for Shameless Attack

Not surprised by this at all. Erik Paulsen and the MNGOP drag John Kline into their nasty attack campaign, then veterans come back to defend Ashwin Madia:

IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETS BLAST ERIK PAULSEN FOR ATTACKS ON MADIA

WASHINGTON – The largest group of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, VoteVets.org, today blasted Erik Paulsen for hiding behind a Congressman to launch smears against Marine and war veteran Ashwin Madia.

This week, Congressman John Kline hurled a smear – accusing Madia of “exploiting” Marines in a new campaign ad, which uses widely available stock footage of Marines to visually reinforce Madia’s service.  Kline is from another Congressional district, while Madia’s opponent, Paulsen, never served in the military.

“Shame on Erik Paulsen for using others to hurl baseless smears against an honorable war veteran, and not having the guts to do it on his own,” said Jon Soltz, Iraq War Veteran and Chairman of VoteVets.org.  “Ashwin has every right to be proud of his service to the Marines, and hold that experience close to his heart.   And, he has every right to highlight for voters how that experience has shaped his views and values.”

“If Erik Paulsen has a problem with Ashwin’s service to the Marines and to America, then he should be man enough to say it himself.  And, if he can’t do that, people need to ask whether or not Erik Paulsen is strong enough to talk straight with his constituents,” Soltz added.

VoteVets.org PAC’s primary goal is to help elect those Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans running for public office, and defeat those whose views and records are not in line with the best interest of veterans and troops.  The group has endorsed Ashwin Madia for Congress.

Oh snap.

Eric Black: “Erik Paulsen on tax cuts: inflammatory and misleading”

Eric Black takes Erik Paulsen’s rhetoric to reality:

[Paulsen] believes that the Bush tax cuts, rather than contributing to the deficit, “brought in huge new revenues.” In describing what he calls “the gravity” of allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire, he says it would cost $2,600 for every person in the 3rd District.

This strikes me as inflammatory and misleading, since both parties agree on extending the tax cuts for all but the wealthiest 2 percent or so of Americans, generally those earning more than $250,000 a year. Most Democrats, including Paulsen’s opponent, Ashwin Madia, favor allowing the cuts to expire for those wealthy few, raising the marginal rate on them to the pre-Bush level. Most Republicans favor extending the Bush cuts completely.

The real stakes are dramatically lower than Paulsen suggests, and would directly affect only the wealthiest 1 or 2 percent of families. I asked Paulsen about this after the presentation and he suggested that Madia, earlier in the campaign, actually has favored allowing the Bush tax to expire totally, for all tax brackets. I covered the early stages of this race and I do not remember Madia taking such a position. Paulsen says there is video to back it up.

Madia spokester Dan Pollock says Paulsen is mischaracterizing Madia’s position, but has been using a piece of out-of-context video that creates a false impression. I called the Paulsen campaign and ask for whatever evidence they have on this. So far, none has been forthcoming.

Oh, but there’s even more. Fantastic journalism by Eric Black. 

Paulsen’s positions are flimsy and dishonest while his negative attacks on his opponent are shameless. Paulsen is toast.

MNGOP Drags Kline Into Paulsen’s Disaster

When Ashwin Madia continues to stay positive in his latest ad, Team Paulsen/Brodkorb were probably scratching their heads as to how they could fight it. Why not attack his military service? Who better than former Marine John Kline? Funny that Kline over in CD2 will willingly try to bash the use of the military in Madia’s ad while Kline himself has no problem touting half of his own ad while in uniform. Way to go, John Kline.

Madia released a disciplined statement:

I am proud to have served in the Marines and in Iraq.  Once a Marine, always a Marine, and I am proud, and will always be proud, to stand by my fellow Marines.  Through my service in the Marines, I learned team work and discipline. We need more of that in Congress.  I am talking about those needs in my new ad and on the campaign trail. In these challenging times, Minnesotans are looking for leadership and vision from the people they send to Washington – the leadership and vision necessary to get our country back on track. I will continue to communicate my positive message of change to the people of the Third District.

Paulsen also seems to have zero problem putting people in uniform even on the front page of his website:

These people are shameless. Sure, Paulsen is desperate but it’s an especially bad move for John Kline by agreeing to step into this mess.

UPDATE: John Kline’s hypocrisy on this subject is a lot bigger than I thought.

Secret Paulsen, Bachmann and Kline Fundraiser With John Boehner Tonight

From the DFL:

Still in Hiding, Paulsen Accepts Help from Embattled Republican Leader

Boehner raises money for Paulsen, Bachmann and Kline behind closed doors

St. Paul (October 14, 2008) — This evening, Republican House Minority Leader John Boehner is expected to appear at a fundraising event in downtown Minneapolis. Appearing with the embattled Republican leader will be Republican Third District Candidate Erik Paulsen and Republican Representatives Michele Bachmann and John Kline.

Minnesota DFL Associate Communications Director Eric Fought released this statement:

“Erik Paulsen has spent the past 14 years as a professional partisan politician, advancing the most radical tenets of his party’s platform and leading the charge in the Minnesota House.

“True to form, Paulsen and fellow Republicans will gladly accept help tonight from one of the most ardent champions of the failed policies of the Bush administration. And in the spirit of Paulsen’s stealth campaign for Congress, which he conducted by hiding from the public and press, Paulsen will accept Boehner’s help behind closed doors, away from public and media scrutiny.

“Erik Paulsen would have Minnesotans forget his long career of far right-wing Republican partisanship — which is why he’s refusing to meet with anyone except other partisan Republicans in private. It’s past time for Erik Paulsen — not to mention Michele Bachmann and John Kline — to level with the people of Minnesota how their ideas for the next two years are any different than the past eight.”

Anyone in the mood for a $1,000 steak dinner with Republicans not being public about how they’re Republicans tonight?

Rothenberg: CD3 Turns to “Toss Up/Tilt Democratic”

No surprise here:

Stu Rothenberg has moved his ranking of Minnesota’s 3rd Congressional District from toss-up to toss up/tilts Democratic. The race to replace GOP Rep. Jim Ramstad features DFLer Ashwin Madia, Republican Erik Paulsen and I-P candidate David Dillon.

And in The Politico:

Darren White and Erik Paulsen were prized Republican recruits, House candidates poised to be the new face of the GOP on Capitol Hill.

But as the two head into the homestretch of their campaigns, GOP operatives say they’ll probably have to win — or lose — on their own. The money national Republicans earmarked for White in New Mexico and for Paulsen in Minnesota will likely go instead to protect GOP incumbents who once looked like locks for reelection.

Despite the negative tactics of Paulsen’s campaign, Madia taking the high road is paying off.

Madia Stays Positive In New TV Spot

While Erik Paulsen’s technique is to smear Ashwin Madia and try to call him a “liar,” Madia responds with a piece about his service and what he wants to do as a member of Congress.

Balancing the budget, oversight of the financial markets, Madia’s integrity and bringing our troops home are the themes. What are Paulsen’s themes? Scare tactics: being dishonest about about tax policy, creating media-friendly lawn sign stories, turning his Wikipedia page into an advertisement, distracting from his record and trying to put artificial labels on his opponent.

Will Paulsen be able to step up to Madia’s level and create an ad that can win on issues? I’m guessing not.