Tag Archive for 'Mark Ritchie'

Minnesota Majority doubles down, attacks MN Supreme Court

Is it possible that Mark Ritchie and our county election officials have been doing a good job? Is it possible that Minnesota Majority’s lawsuit against Mark Ritchie was rejected because, like all of the GOP’s other lawsuits, it was frivolous and unfounded?

No, of course not. It’s because the Supreme Court didn’t want to face facts, according to Minnesota Majority:

The conservative coalition that filed suit in May against Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie and 31 county auditors is accusing the Minnesota Supreme Court of dismissing the lawsuit Thursday to spare itself “the embarrassment of having to acknowledge major election system problems after just issuing its decision in the (Norm Coleman-Al Franken) contest.”

“Here you have a major U.S. Senate race being decided by just a few hundred votes, and along comes our case citing the fact that the secretary of state has been unable to account for tens of thousands of voters in the 2008 election,” Minnesota Majority president Jeff Davis said in a statement. “You can see why the court might not want to touch this case with a 10-foot pole.”

Incredible. Are they really so deluded by their hatred of Ritchie? They’re seriously arguing that our Supreme Court decided to abdicate their responsibility and refuse to apply the rule of law? I’m pretty sure the right’s hatred of Ritchie now borders on psychosis.

Michael Brodkorb’s Irrational Personal Vendetta Against Mark Ritchie, pt. 2

Last November, Matt wrote about Michael Brodkorb’s bizarre obsession with Secretary of State Mark Ritchie:

…there’s something more with Michael’s vile hatred for Secretary of State Ritchie.  Something that I can’t put my finger on.  Is it just the reality of a DFL SoS that stokes Michael’s fire, is it Ritchie’s determination to make sure everyone in Minnesota can vote, did he just really like Mary Kiffemeyer?

Now that he’s Deputy Chairman of the GOP, Brodkorb is bringing his irrational hatred with him, in the form of a senseless attack on Ritchie a full 16 months before the election. This is just another in a series of bizarre attacks. After all, 16 months before the election, who cares? The only reason for the attack is because Brodkorb seems unable to control his rage; it certainly doesn’t make political sense.

Matt suggested a few reasons for Brodkorb’s hatred of Ritchie. I really don’t care what his reasons are; I’m more interested in his inability to get over it. It was one thing wasting his own time and resources on discredited attacks against Ritchie, but it boggles the mind that he’s managed to drag the entire Republican party into his vendetta. Does the GOP, given the huge challenges it faces, really want to spend its money satisfying Michael Brodkorb’s whims?

I suppose I should be thankful they’re throwing away their money. I guess it’s just said to see the last vestiges of a moderate, rational GOP disappearing.

You have to respect Mark Ritchie

An item in the news yesterday has made me think, once again, of how much respect I have for Secretary of State Mark Ritchie. His handling of the Franken-Coleman recount won him praise from both sides of the aisle, and raised his profile tremendously. But despite Minnesotans’ high level of approval of the way Ritchie conducted the recount, he’s not planning on using the recount to launch a run for higher office:

Ritchie said he will lobby his wife for a second term in office, but rejected the idea of seeking higher office, noting some have urged a gubernatorial run.

“I’ve been pretty resistant to that,” he said, adding he prefers his current post, which Ritchie said “allows me to focus on the democracy itself.”

After watching him in action, I really believe that focusing on democracy is his passion. Above all else, Ritchie has been concerned with the integrity of our election process, and he’s defended it from attacks from both the right and the left. It’s our good fortune that he was our Secretary of State during the recount, and I hope it will be our continued fortune to have him as Secretary of State from 2010 to 2014.

[via David Brauer]

PIM: Ritchie is “Politician of the Year”

Sarah Janecek is no fan of Al Franken, a fact that makes it all the more remarkable that her publication, Politics in Minnesota, just named Secretary of State Mark Ritchie “Politician of the Year.”  Check out what PIM had to say about Ritchie:


Ritchie has done an extraordinary job running the U.S. Senate recount.
Sure, there are bones to be picked about what the State Canvassing Board did. Bones that will be now be picked, in a court of law. But the administrative process Ritchie ran was the process we have on the books, the process that had to be followed. Those were long, long canvassing board meetings that Ritchie ran and as chair, he made the motion on each ballot. Lost on many was how meticulously and consistently Ritchie made the motions. He offered the same motion on each ballot, but then, if that motion was rejected, offered the follow-up motion that made sense given the discussion that had just occurred on that particular ballot. A methodical, consistent process. For most Minnesotans who tuned in for part or all of the recount, Ritchie was the face of it.

Ritchie also became a terrific spokesperson for our process. If he said it once, he said it a million times, Minnesota’s election system has been “under the microscope.” At every juncture in the process since the election, Ritchie has held “press availabilities” almost ad nauseum. At every one of those press conferences and in every media appearance we saw or heard, Ritchie spoke to the process, not to the party. He made Minnesota proud in national media

…We dare anyone to find one public statement made by Ritchie during the recount that was partisan in favor of Franken. It cannot be done, because Ritchie didn’t do it, and we — and many others — were carefully looking for one. Our historically partisan Democrat Secretary of State proved to be a nonpartisan statesman.

Republicans have been trying to smear Mark Ritchie from the first day of the recount. Fortunately, polls released last week show that their efforts have been unsuccessful. Mark Ritchie is a true public servant who has done a terrific job during this recount process.

Mark Ritchie: Recounts are for the loser to understand they lost

A little blast from the past (well, November 5, 2008): at a press conference, Mark Ritchie reminds us that “…recounts are for really the loser to understand and see and then believe that they in fact did not win the election and for their supporters to come to the same conclusion.”

The recount will help Team Coleman “…to understand and see and then believe that they in fact did not win the election…”

[Hat Tip to Michael B. Brodkorb]

Media Matters Nails Fox News On Rumor Michael Brodkorb Started

Even though the “Lizard People” ballot is pretty darn funny, I think Media Matters catching Fox News’ Andrew Napolitano lying takes the cake for me this week in recount news:

During the November 19 edition of Fox News’ Studio B, Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano, a former New Jersey Superior Court judge, baselessly claimed that Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie (D) is a “former member of the Communist Party.” Discussing the members appointed to the Minnesota State Canvassing Board, which oversees the recount in the Minnesota Senate race, Napolitano stated: “The fifth member of the committee by statute, is the secretary of state, who is a Democrat and a former communist — former member of the Communist Party.” Napolitano provided no evidence to support his claim that Ritchie is “a former communist” or a “former member of the Communist Party.”

Hilarious. Communist? Really? Where did you get that information? Oh yeah, a rumor that dedicated MNpublius reader Michael Brodkorb himself started. Note, Michael Brodkorb may not have directly claimed that Mark Ritchie was a communist, but he did start the rumor. From a post that he quickly retracted this evening for some reason:

As the blogger who broke the story about Ritchie’s connection to Communist Party, please see the links to my original posts.

He then links to all four examples of his own “research” that shows these amazing ties between Mark Ritchie and Communism. First, he links to a piece at the Community Party website that actually has nothing to do with Mark Ritchie or his political views except for the fact he got mentioned as someone that is known to protect voter’s rights and being part of the voter protection movement. Brodkorb picks his quote wisely and doesn’t include what’s written after it. Brilliant. Secondly, he links to an piece that Mark Ritchie wrote that appeared on the People’s Weekly World. Brodkorb writes:

Ritchie’s writings have been published by newspaper with “a special relationship with the Communist Party USA.”

Even if that connection is incredibly weak in the first place, Brodkorb doesn’t tell you that the piece was originally at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (.doc) dated a couple weeks earlier and simply reprinted by the People’s Weekly World. Heh.

Brodkorb’s third example is how the Star Tribune mentioned Brodkorb’s spun version of his first example. Congratulations, Mr. Michael B. Brodkorb! I wonder how that happened?!

The fourth and final example is a $250 contribution to Mark Ritchie from a donor that is also part of an organization that “is dedicated to providing information and activities relating to contemporary Cuba and contributing to a normalization of relations between Cuba and the U.S.”

Wow. $250 from someone interested in normalizing relations between Cuba and the U.S.? That must mean Ritchie is a secret communist!

By the time the telephone tag is done, we have Fox News lying by saying that Mark Ritchie was part of the Communist Party.

The level of wing-nuttery exceeds my normal threshold and perhaps this occurred to Michael Brodkorb when he decided to pull the post down within minutes after posting it. It’s that or he realized that when he linked to Media Matters showing that the whole Communist connection is a load of bunk, he may no longer have wanted to take credit for spreading the rumor.

State Canvassing Board Declares “No Winner”; Agrees to Consider Absentee Ballots

As the recount gets underway today, it’s important to restate that the State Canvassing Board yesterday clearly declared that there is no certified winner in the U.S. Senate race in Minnesota given the incredibly small margin of .007%.  Ritchie’s quote on the matter:

Candidates can say anything.  Minnesota law is very clear that any election within a half a percent is not known until the completion of the recount.

Moreover, the Coleman talking point that Franken was trying to delay the start of the election was quickly discredited when Justice G. Barry Anderson stated that consideration of the Franken campaign’s briefs would not delay the recount and, indeed, it began on time today.

Importantly, the board also agreed that the Franken’s plea to consider every properly cast vote, including improperly rejected absentee ballots, will be considered.  The Franken campaign has the benefit of being on the right side of this issue: they’re merely requesting and attempting to ensure that every properly cast vote is count.  Democracy?  Pshh, that went out of style with Nixon.

So, with all this information bouncing around.  What do you think will be the outcome of this craziness?  2 polls, one to get a simple count (without the discount of complex answers) and another to assess people’s view of the process. I can’t get both polls working at the same time for some crazy (frustrating!) reason, so the one’s going to have to suffice:

More detail: what’s going to happen?

View Results

Loading ... Loading …

Paging Sarah Janecek

Here is what Republican Sarah Janecek wrote in the initial days after the election:

The outsider ethos that has plagued Al Franken since the inception of his candidacy two years ago now manifests itself in an even uglier fashion: casting doubt on Minnesota’s election process…

Franken and the DFL Party are not entitled to, at best, cast doubt on our process, or worse, create chaos. The PR and legal strategy appears to hang on “properly cast votes properly counted.”…

The incredible irony here is that Democrats appear to be setting up SOS Ritchie — an unabashed liberal — as being responsible for not ensuring that some votes may have not been properly cast or properly counted.

That’s rich. But it’s also wrong.

We’ve talked to a number of rank-and-file election judges (from both parties) this week and they feel insulted. These people volunteer their time year after year to do the Good Neighbor thing at the polls. To smear our elections process is to smear them, they believe…

I carefully listened to both events. Ritchie sidestepped a few partisan shots that would have been easy to make. Kudos to Richie, who, unlike other DFLers, seems to be a much better judge of what’s going on here:

The nation is watching. Minnesota is not Florida or Ohio. Can we please not trash our process?

Reading this ten days after it was written, it almost seems preposterous that Janecek was writing about DFL, and not GOP, attempts to undermine Minnesota’s election process.

Over the last two weeks, Mark Ritchie has been the target of a concerted smear campaign by Republicans trying to undermine the recount and Minnesota’s election process. Despite the fact that there is ZERO evidence of ANY wrongdoing on the part of Mark Ritchie and despite the fact that Republicans from Katherine Kerten to Fritz Knaak to Tim Pawlenty have all admitted as much, conservative hacks like Michael Brodkorb and conservative groups like Minnesota Majority continue to try to torpedo a process that, by all indications, is working exactly as it should.

To Sarah’s credit, she did call out Norm in the piece I linked to above:

I disagree with GOP U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman’s initial strategy of trying to discourage a recount. Franken is entitled to one, and Minnesota law wisely provides for one in close races.

But since that time, team Coleman has done far worse than just discourage a recount. They’ve been working to cast Ritchie as a biased partisan (despite NO evidence supporting that conclusion) and they’ve been attempting to de-legitimatize the recount even before the results are known.

I hope Republicans like Sarah Janecek, who have professed support for letting the process work, will object to these disgusting tactics.

What do Fritz Knaak, Katherine Kersten and MPR Have in Common?

As the canvassing process concludes and the recount begins, I am finding the manufactured outrage and suspicion coming from the right almost impossible to bear.  The MN GOP’s favorite hack, Katherine Kersten, has a hit piece in the Star Tribune today.  The first 15 paragraphs of the column are devoted to casting suspicion upon Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie and characterizing him as a tool of west coast liberals.  Then, after all that suspicion-building, Kersten writes this in the 16th paragraph:

Thus far, Ritchie has shown no evidence of misconduct.

No evidence of misconduct. Even Katherine Kersten has to admit that there is ZERO evidence that Mark Ritchie has been anything but an impartial and fair arbiter during this process. It would have been nice if she had put out that little nugget a little sooner in her column, but as our Governor is fond of saying, let’s not make the perfect the enemy of the good.

Of course, Kersten isn’t the only one who will admit that what happened in the canvassing process was above board. Coleman’s own lawyer, Fritz Knaak, told the Pioneer Press that what was happening was “neither wrong nor unfair.” Try to keep that quote in the back of your mind as this story continues to unfold.

In addition, MPR came out with an analysis of previous election returns today. The conclusion:

The shifting vote totals in Minnesota’s U.S. Senate race may be vexing, but a look by Minnesota Public Radio at past elections shows it’s nothing unusual.

Here is the bottom line: Minnesota has one of the best election systems in the country. We should be proud of it. Republican activists like Michael Brodkorb are busy trying to undermine our democracy with absolutley zero evidence that anything improper has occurred. Don’t take my word for it, listen to Fritz Knaak, Katherine Kersten and MPR.

Voters, Press and Everyone But Team Coleman Says: Let The Voters Decide The Outcome

Minneapolis Star Tribune:

Coleman’s call for Franken to waive the recount should go unheeded. Let the recount proceed.

Candidates’ claims of victory or concessions of defeat don’t decide elections. Certified vote totals do.

Saint Paul Pioneer Press:

We’re going to have a recount. We need a recount. It is not up to the candidates. It is up to the voters.

Rochester Post-Bulletin:

Sen. Norm Coleman says Democratic challenger Al Franken should accept defeat, renounce his right to an automatic recount and let Minnesota move on. “I just think the need for the healing process is so important.”

We respectfully disagree.

Worthington Daily Globe:

For Coleman to suggest that Franken is wasting state money by allowing a recount to go forward undermines the fact that the recount law was enacted to ensure the fairest election possible.

…the tradition of Minnesota’s strong election turnout should by all means upheld by securing a truly accurate result.

Fergus Falls Daily Journal:

Coleman said Wednesday that Franken should consider stepping aside.

We believe that to do so would be wrong.

We agree with Franken, who said Thursday on Minnesota Public Radio that “candidates don’t get to decide when an election’s over - voters do.”

Bemidji Pioneer:

We hope both campaigns just step back, observe and participate in the eventual recount and accept whatever results arise. Minnesota voters do not want to see the vitriol continue to exchange between these two candidates.

Fairmont Sentinel:

It’s hard to believe we’re writing this, but it’s clear that Franken - known for his over-the-top humor and partisan antics - is the one acting with class in this serious situation.

Voters, indeed, deserve to know the outcome of a recount. It’s not up to those who may or may not be the winner.

Comedy Central’s Indecision 2008:

It’s called “Minnesota nice,” and Sen. Norm Coleman is chock full of it! Especially when he encourages his opponent in a razor-thin election to just give up and let him win.

The state’s official election tally has Coleman atop challenger Stuart “Al Franken” Smalley by a mere 477 votes. By Minnesota law, a margin this small automatically goes to a recount, which, given voting irregularities claimed by Franken’s team, could lead to a different final outcome.

Coleman, meanwhile, has taken the gracious step of suggesting the Franken decline a recount so that he (Coleman) can take his leadership abilities, along with his teeth and hair, back to Washington, where they belong…

Regarding the recount, if you didn’t catch Secretary of State Mark Ritchie on MPR’s Midday today, Bob Collins has a full recap as well as the audio. Despite the partisan attacks from Team Coleman, I believe the Secretary of State office has shown strong integrity and I think Minnesotans should be proud of this process.

Oh Michael…

Michael Brodkorb claims that I “asked for more post [sic] exposing Senator Amy Klobuchar.”

The intention of my post was to point out Brodkorb’s obsession with Mark Ritchie, not to ask for more ridiculous hyperventilating posts about anyone. That being said, if Michael Brodkorb, a former Mark Kennedy consultant, wants to continue to attack Amy Klobuchar with the same absurd vitriol that characterized Kennedy’s Senate campaign, perhaps Klobuchar will win by 40 points next time around. I thought Minnesotans were pretty clear in the last election. They’ll take Amy’s positive, issue oriented campaign over the mudslinging grudge warfare that Brodkorb practices everyday of the week and twice on Tuesdays.

Absurd

This is What Happen When the SoS Likes Democracy

It’s refreshing to have a Secretary of State who wants more people to vote not less (radical idea, huh?). Secretary of State Mark Ritchie (thank God Kiffmeyer is gone) proposed the following today:

If you’re licensed to drive in Minnesota, you’d be automatically registered to vote, too.

That’s the thrust behind one of several voter law proposals announced Wednesday by new Secretary of State Mark Ritchie.

Ritchie said his proposal would save counties time and money, and cut out “the hassle for citizens who have to stand in more lines and fill out more paperwork.”

Under his plan, people could check a box on license applications if they don’t want automatic registration. Older methods of registering to vote would remain intact, including the Election Day option. [MPR]

Let’s keep this guy around.

Technorati Tags:

DFLers Swanson, Ritchie, Otto Off to Good Start

I know it’s EXTREMELY early, I like what we’re seeing on the DFL state constitutional candidates….

Closest margin [with 4%] is 13 points!

Hopefully this holds for all three as returns start coming in from out-state….