Finally a bit of progress on a bonding bill?
In case you haven’t been paying close attention, allow me to quickly summarize the last week of news out of the legislature:
Vikings Vikings Vikings Vikings Vikings Vikings Vikings Vikings
Meanwhile, the economy remains precarious, but though construction season is well underway, the bonding bill has been placed on the back burner. It should have been passed two months ago. Whatever happens with the Vikings stadium, it’s no substitute for a real bonding bill that would create tens of thousands of jobs and make important investments in our state. The legislature should be putting jobs first.
Finally, though, there’s a bit of progress. Unfortunately, it appears legislators have agreed on a bonding bill that’s half as large as it should be:
[Rep. Larry Howes, R-Walker] insisted the bonding bill will remain at $496 million, a figure the four legislative leaders and Capital Investment experts agreed upon.
The deal comes after DFL House members repeatedly criticized Republicans for putting forward a bill that didn’t spend enough and didn’t have DFL input.
Rep. Alice Hausman, DFL-St. Paul, said she’s pleased with the changes. She said Democrats made the decision to support the bill even if it didn’t meet their initial expectations. She said a smaller bill is better than no bill at all.
I agree that creating half the jobs we possibly could is better than creating no jobs. But you know what’s even better? Creating all the jobs.
I guess I should be happy that there will be a bonding bill at all, given the MNGOP’s aversion to jobs legislation and the Capitol’s fixation on the Vikings. I can’t help feeling, though, like this is a major missed opportunity.




