MNGOP: [some] elections have consequences
Elections have consequences. So they say. But when it’s Republicans saying it, what they really mean is that elections of Republicans have consequences. The rest, for some peculiar reason, don’t count.
Thus Mitch Berg, salivating over a redistricting map that would dramatically shift power in Minnesota’s congressional elections, insists that the DFL must accept the Republican map because “elections have consequences:”
The DFL isn’t going to like it – but redistricting isn’t supposed to be predicated on the happiness of the party that loses the election.
Well, then, it’s a good thing Mark Dayton won the governorship, huh? Just think: If Tom Emmer hadn’t spent two weeks straight talking about waiters, he might very well be in the governor’s mansion to sign this disaster of a redistricting plan. But he’s not. So it’s going to be vetoed.
Because elections have consequences.


Multiple news outlets are reporting this morning that 

